Re: eth1 messing up eth0 and routing question

2001-09-05 Thread bedlam
> On 5 Sep 2001 08:29:37 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >I can ping outside and inside networks from the router, and I can ping the > >LAN > side of the router from a local computer, but I can't ping outside from the > local computer. > > You need SNAT ("ip masquerading") like this: > >

Re: eth1 messing up eth0 and routing question

2001-09-05 Thread bedlam
> >I can ping outside and inside networks from the router, and I can ping the > >LAN > side of the router from a local computer, but I can't ping outside from the > local computer. > > You need SNAT ("ip masquerading") like this: > > if [ -n "$EXTERNAL" ]; then > for ext in $EXTER

eth1 messing up eth0 and routing question

2001-09-05 Thread bedlam
I have two nics in a Debian 2.2 machine w/ kernel 2.4.9. eth0 is a Linksys Ether16 using the ne driver, eth1 is a Linksys 10/100 using the tulip driver. I'm trying to build a router and firewall using iptables. When I bring up eth0 (connected to the cable modem) it works fine. I can take it

Re: Linksys EtherFast 10/100 v5 has no IRQ

2001-08-30 Thread bedlam
Ok, I am pleased to announce that my card seems to be working now. I could ping one computer from the other over my LAN. The problem seems to have rested in the infinite stupidity of whoever built this Compaq... because I pulled one pci card out, moved my nic to the now empty pci slot, and sud

Re: Linksys EtherFast 10/100 v5 has no IRQ

2001-08-30 Thread bedlam
Ok, I am pleased to announce that my card seems to be working now. I could ping one computer from the other over my LAN. The problem seems to have rested in the infinite stupidity of whoever built this Compaq... because I pulled one pci card out, moved my nic to the now empty pci slot, and sud

Re: Linksys EtherFast 10/100 v5 has no IRQ

2001-08-29 Thread bedlam
On Wed, 29 August 2001, "Michael P. Soulier" wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 12:07:02AM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > > > > "gcc -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/net/inet > > -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -c tulip.c > > '[ -f /usr/include/linux/modver

Re: Linksys EtherFast 10/100 v5 has no IRQ

2001-08-29 Thread bedlam
On Wed, 29 August 2001, "Michael P. Soulier" wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:03:57PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I have a Linksys Etherfast 10/100, I think it's revision 3, though. All you > > should need to do is enable the driver in the kernel, compile, then, if you > > compile

Re: Linksys EtherFast 10/100 v5 has no IRQ

2001-08-28 Thread bedlam
On Tue, 28 August 2001, dman wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 07:07:44AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > | In my ongoing effort to put a second NIC in my computer I have > | purchased a new NIC, an EtherFast 10/100 version 5. However, Linux > | or my box doesn't see the NIC enough to give it

Linksys EtherFast 10/100 v5 has no IRQ

2001-08-28 Thread bedlam
In my ongoing effort to put a second NIC in my computer I have purchased a new NIC, an EtherFast 10/100 version 5. However, Linux or my box doesn't see the NIC enough to give it an IRQ number. Everything else seems in order when I pull up cat /proc/pci, except there is no IRQ number... I'm tr

Re: netgear fa311 NIC driver

2001-08-25 Thread bedlam
On Fri, 24 August 2001, Donald Becker wrote: > > On 24 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Fri, 24 August 2001, Donald Becker wrote: > > > On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 05:50:25PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > I have upgraded to

Re: netgear fa311 NIC driver

2001-08-25 Thread bedlam
On Fri, 24 August 2001, Donald Becker wrote: > > On 24 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Fri, 24 August 2001, Donald Becker wrote: > > > On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 05:50:25PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > I have upgraded to

Re: netgear fa311 NIC driver

2001-08-24 Thread bedlam
On Fri, 24 August 2001, Donald Becker wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 05:50:25PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I have upgraded to kernel 2.4.9 so I would have support for the > > > netgear fa311 NIC, specifically the natsemi driver. >

netgear fa311 NIC driver

2001-08-24 Thread bedlam
I have upgraded to kernel 2.4.9 so I would have support for the netgear fa311 NIC, specifically the natsemi driver. However, it is behaving strangely. I repeatedly get the error message: eth1: Something Wicked Happened! 18000 I've looked at the website www.scyld.com/network/natsemi.html and t

can't find kmod info

2001-08-22 Thread bedlam
I am having difficulty loading the 2.4.9 kernel, I get an error in kmod, something to the effect kmod: failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k binfmt-464c, errno = 8 I have looked all over and can't find anything documenting kmod. I don't know what binfmt-464c is either. I made a list of all driv

followup to 2.4.9 boot problems

2001-08-21 Thread bedlam
Thanks everyone for the help, Adrian's page helped quite a bit, now I'm starting to boot, but after about two screens of stuff I get a repeated message: kmod: failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k binfmt-464c, errno = 8 This is printed over and over and over, what do I do? Matt --

2.4.9 won't boot

2001-08-20 Thread bedlam
I have recently installed Debian on an old Pentium computer using the official image from debian.org. I have it running w/ kernel 2.2.19pre17, however this does not support my Netgear fa311 NIC and I've been unsuccessful in compiling their source code. I've been trying to compile and use the 2