Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will
I would to know the proper way to describe the package name for the
10.7.0 and 10.8.0 stable release installer? I plan on filing a bug
report, and thought I would check here first.
RS
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will
On Apr 30, 12:30 pm, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > * From: Bug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >But when I login in, I still get umask 022. What step am I missing?
>
> I do not use pam_umask , but:
>
> (1) /usr/share/doc/libpam-umask/README says:
Hi,
I've installed libpam-umask 0.04, made sure all umask statements were
either already commented out, or did so for the following files:
1. /etc/login.defs
2. /etc/profile
3. ~/.bash_profile
My /etc/pam.d/common-session file has the following two lines:
session requiredpam_unix.so
ses
for example
deb file:///home/debian/security lenny/updates main contrib non-free
Malte Forkel пишет:
I recently installed Etch by booting a machine from the net using PXE
and specifying a local mirror of ftp.debian.de to the installer. All
went well but I noticed that during the installatio
please give your xorg.conf. you can run mplayer through mplayer -vo x11.
- Tong - пишет:
Package: mplayer
Version: 1:1.0-rc1svn20070225-0.3
Severity: normal
Hi,
I have always been using mplayer from debian-multimedia repo. But
today when I use mplayer, I get:
$ mplayer
mplayer: error w
try to download tarball from mplayer site and execute 'debian/rules bynary'.
Orbit пишет:
Hi,
I can't install mplayer because:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
mplayer: Depends: libavcodeccvs51 (>= 3:20070329) but it is not going to be
installed
Depends: libavfor
PhxVyper пишет:
Hi,
I'm very new to Debian and deb packages. I have installed a number of
different deb packages for Apache, PHP5, etc.
The libapache2-mod-php5 package I installed has a number of extensions
built in, but there are some that are missing that I need.
php5-mcrypt
php5-xmlrpc
a
AIL PROTECTED]>
If you wish to continue to submit further information on this problem,
please send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as before.
Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
Debian bug tracking
TED]>
If you wish to continue to submit further information on this problem,
please send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as before.
Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
Your message did not contain a Subject
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#413933: zorp: policy.boot cannot be found,
which was filed against the zorp package.
It has been closed by Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is
unsatisfactory and you ha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with an explanation
why the bug report should be closed.
Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
AIL PROTECTED]>
If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as before.
Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
Debian bug tracking
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as before.
Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
Debian bug tracking
e or explanation please contact me.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 06:14:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 21 2
e or explanation please contact me.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2004 11:54:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 29 0
e or explanation please contact me.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2004 20:46:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 05 1
I wanted to add support for some more modules in an already built kernel
tree. Then when I ran make_kpkg kernel_image a full recompile started
... is there a way out ?
-- BUG! --
"Anyone who quotes my sig is an idiot" -- Rusty Russell
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Why does make-kpkg fully recompiles the kernel every time ? I wanted to
add some modules only and it seems a "clean" target was run first. Is
there a way to disable this ?
-- BUG! --
"Anyone who quotes my sig is an idiot" -- Rusty Russell
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
t;
If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as before.
Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
)
If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as before.
Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 25816 netbase
Bug#25816: xinetd use is problematic
Bug#10059: xinetd: inetd.conf changes don't auto-propagate to xinetd.conf
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `netbase'.
> merge 8927 25816
Bug#8927: netstd: upda
it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as before.
Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
27 matches
Mail list logo
