Re: Kicad Installation Issue Regard Of 4.0.4 Its Only Install 4.0.2 In Debian Jessie 8.5

Hello Aravind, [-project removed, since this is not on topic there; added backports instead] On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 08:54:40AM +0530, ARAVIND B KUMAR wrote: > Hello Sir > > This Is Aravind From India > > We Are Try To Install Kicad 4.0.4 In Debain Jessie 8.5 But It Only Install > 4.0.2 That v

Re: How to read mail addressed to "root" from "root" user?

(this isn't about Debian development anymore. I've added a Cc to debian-user; if you have any follow-up questions, please drop the -devel Cc). On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 08:44:04PM +0300, Jayson Willson wrote: > Thank you very much for your answer! > Could you please tell me, why is it recommended to

Re: your thoughts: special post for Debian birthday

Hi Brian, On 12-08-13 21:09, Brian Potkin wrote: > On Mon 12 Aug 2013 at 11:57:42 +0200, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote: > >> Dear users and contributors, >> >> We would like publishing a special post in bits.d.o for the anniversary of >> Debian. The idea is publishing anonymous quotes from Debian use

Re: Is it a bug: huge dependency problems of php5 and ikiwiki

(this really isn't Debian-arm specific; please direct follow-ups, if any, to the debian-user mailinglist) On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 05:11:43PM +0200, Xan wrote: > Hi, > > I have a NSLU2 device (armel computer). With Debian 5.0.2 installed. > I cannot use reportbug because exim4 is not configured pr

Re: [OT] Need old Packages.gz and Release Files

On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 03:35:57PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello, > > I have had an accident on my Debian-Archiv-Server and unfortunatly the > files "Packages.gz", "Packages.bz2", "Sources.gz", "Sources.bz2" and > "Release" from the directories > > /debian/dists/${RELEASE}/main

Re: [OT] Need old Packages.gz and Release Files

On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 12:44:38PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > Neat project. I am not sure why being able to install 3.0r3 rather than > 3.0r6 is necesarily very useful, but it is neat to have the choice. To have reproducibility of installations, where such is necessary (e.g., software escro

Re: hi..i need ur help

Side note: next time, please choose your subject line and the mailinglist to which you're sending your email more carefully. I *almost* filed this message as spam. I'd say questions such as this one would belong on the debian-user mailinglist, not debian-project. Please send any replies there. On

Re: Lost on new insatallation

Note, you should really have sent this to debian-user@lists.debian.org, our user support mailinglist. I Cc'ed them, please replies (if any) there. On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 08:27:52PM -0700, Sam Franc wrote: > I just bought Debian 3.1 i386 Rel R2. > I know absolutely nothing about Linux. > I have be

Re: Broken applications: Could we be honest?

On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 07:23:54PM +0300, Török Edvin wrote: > Btw, what is the appropriate severity level for a package that doesn't > work on a certain architecture at all? Is it release critical? If the architecture is a release candidate, yes. -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "As

Re: price of the 3 debian cds much more expensive than what it is told on the website

[debian-www isn't really the most appropriate list for this type of question; adding debian-user to the Cc list. Please direct replies, if any, there, removing debian-www from the list] On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:30:52AM +0200, bruno doutriaux wrote: > je pense que j'aurais pu vous parler en franç

Re: Installation hitch

On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 11:01:20PM -0800, sphitz wrote: > Hi debian folks, > > I'm trying to install debian on a Dell Dimension E310 from a recently burned > net install disc, i386 Binary 1. Strangely, during the initial phase of the > installation I can use the keyboard to select from the menu,

Re: Debian

On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 03:00:37PM -0500, Christopher Lemire wrote: > *What is different about debian 3.1r0 and r1 r2 through r6? > I do not know whether to get r0 or something else because I do not > know the difference. There is no 3.1r1 or higher yet; but when it exists, it will consist of just

Re: driver package for TRIO 3D/2X

On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 09:03:34AM +0700, Le Minh Nghia wrote: > Hi administrator! > > My computer have been installed by Debian os, but xserver - xfree86 is not > working. > > Although i configured xserver-xfree86 by > > "dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86" but it's failed. > > I can not loggin

Re: Linux Operating System

On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 01:27:55PM +0700, Deskha wrote: > Dear Sir or Madam, > > We would like to ask to you about Linux Operating System. Which one > operating system that we can pay only one times but it can useful for > another PC in the same organization? We are very glad if you would > exp

Re: The Bit-Torent servers are so slow, just wondering why?

[This isn't appropriate on -www. Cc set to -user, where it is. Please direct any followups there] On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 11:01:00AM -0400, jimmckenzie wrote: > I'm trying to Download the 301r0a ISO's for the DVD's of Debian Linux for > x86. It seems to downloading at dial up speed and I have a

Re: deployment question

On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 11:17:00AM +0200, Simon Balzan wrote: > Dear Sir, > > Can you help me in finding a third party software that helps me make a > deployment of Windows XP from a Linux server. Not me (I don't use Windows, have no experience with that); but I wanted to point out that you've a

Re: Limiting User Commands

On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 03:14:53AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 07:53:33PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >In regards to the latter method, would it be possible for me to change > >> >the group ownership of the commands I don't want users to have access > >> to

Re: Limiting User Commands

On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 07:53:33PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >In regards to the latter method, would it be possible for me to change > >the group ownership of the commands I don't want users to have access to > >and revoke execute permission from that group? > > Yes, you can make somethin

Re: IA-64 installation

On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 02:47:53PM +0200, Radie Erasmus wrote: > I am using Fedora on my AMD Athlon 64 PC at home, In that case, you don't need IA-64 (which is for Intel's itanium architecture, see ), but the amd64 port instead. That port hasn't been ma

Re: Installation Error

On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 10:04:51AM +0400, Faisal Rauf wrote: > My name is Faisal Rauf from Abu Dhabi U.A.E. I download the > DEBAIN Linux 3.0 from www.DEBAIN.org site. I > am trying to install Linux on our server but its giving error like > EMM386. Its P4 Intel

Re: Why Linux, Why Debian

st then verify by hand (and very few people do in > my experience). In their case, there isn't even a gpg key, at least not AFAIK. CVSup servers can be compromised too... -- Wouter Verhelst Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org Nederlandstalige Linux-documentatie -- http://nl.linu

Re: Why Linux, Why Debian

king with a ports-installed version of the vulnerable package, you'll stay vulnerable for as long as the compilation runs, which may or may not be a considerable amount of time. This has benefits in other areas too, of course, although it is much cited as one of the problems of stable;

Re: [Help]!

On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, mantis wrote: > hi please could someone give me a hand i've been trying to source drivers for > a FM-56AMR winmodem > (unfortunately) on debian 2.2 without any success if you could please give me > some assistance > would be greatly appreciated thanks it would be nice if you

Re: Recommendations on Linux C/C++/Java IDE?

On 20 Nov 2001, Anders Jackson wrote: > Look at M-x gdb and M-x compile and M-x global-font-lock-mode. Makes things a lot easier. -- wouter dot verhelst at advalvas dot be "Human knowledge belongs to the world" -- From the movie "Antitrust"

Re: X in Woody: you gotta be fscking kidding!

On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Jason Thomas wrote: > On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 04:28:03AM +0200, Peter Mathiasson wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 04:03:59PM -0500, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > > > > > 3. nVidia drivers are not in dexconf's database. If you use an > > >nVidia card, ignore dexconf's questions

Re: X in Woody: you gotta be fscking kidding!

On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Adam Heath wrote: > On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > > > 2. Dexconf asks you if you want to overwrite XF86Config-4. > >If you answer "no", it will proceed with questions about > >your hardware etc. > >It should FOAD (which part of "no" does it not under

Re: vim 6.0 packages

On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 08:01:44AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Craig Sanders wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 03:29:39PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > > > Not needed, I'll settle for Essential: yes :) > > > good idea