In article <avpqko$qr7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stig Are M. Botterli wrote:
>
> I have exactly the same problem with both ROX and Synaptic. How is the
> '/etc/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf.loaders' supposed to be generated?
Ok, installing unstable/libgtk2.0-common, which includes
&#
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Montagne wrote:
>
> Relatedly I also get this when trying to start ROX, which started this
> whole experience:
>
> (rox:8892): GdkPixbuf-WARNING **: Can not open pixbuf loader module
> file
> '/etc/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf.loaders': No such file or directory
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Z Maze wrote:
> "Stig Are M. Botterli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Moseley
>wrote:
>>>
>>> ii gsfonts-x110.16 Make Ghostscript fonts availa
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Moseley
wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Stig Are M. Botterli wrote:
>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Moseley
>wrote:
>> >
>> > $ dpkg -l | grep font
>> >
>> > ii gsfonts-x110.16
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Moseley
wrote:
>
> $ dpkg -l | grep font
>
> ii gsfonts-x110.16 Make Ghostscript fonts available to X11.
This package is a real uglificator. Replace it with a dummy equiv.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Florian Struck wrote:
>
> make menuconfig
> make dep
> make modules
> make-kpkg kernel_image
> and dpkg -i "resulting-kernel.deb"
Step two and three are both taken care of in step four. I also wouldn't
leave out 'make-kpkg clean' before your fourth step. I had some
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hal Vaughan wrote:
>
> When thinking about this, I wonder: Is there a way to easily specify and add
> versions later than in stable for only specific packages? In other words, is
> there some way I can do an apt-get and specify Perl 5.8 (assuming it's
> already
I wanted to remove a dependency from a debian package. I took it apart and
edited the control-file, and put it back together. However, dpkg wouldn't
recognize it as a debian package. 'file' reports it as a "current ar
archive", while it reports the original .deb as a Debian binary package. So
the q
In article <20021206045426.GA22017@ursine>, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> Wait, are you trying to boot a kernel that doesn't have ext3 compiled
> in on a system whose /etc/fstab specifies the / partition as being
> ext3?
Nope, ext2/ext3 have been included in the vmlinuz-image all along.
I'll throw in
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Klaus Imgrund wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Dec 2002 15:16:29 +
>>
> I had kernels bigger than 1 MB - no problem.
> It would help if you remember what things you configured as modules.
Unfortunately, I don't.
> If you got i.e a driver for the wrong sound card compiled i
In article <20021205080347.GE7442@ursine>, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 01:04:34AM +0000, Stig Are M. Botterli wrote:
>> Basically, if my /boot/vmlinuz image exceeds a certain size (the limit se=
>> ems be
>> somewhere around 90 bytes)
Basically, if my /boot/vmlinuz image exceeds a certain size (the limit seems be
somewhere around 90 bytes), the following occurs on boot:
hdc6: bad access: block=2, count=2
end_request: I/O error, dev 16:06 (hdc), sector 2
EXT3-fs: Unable to read superblock
hdc6: bad access: block=2, count=2
e
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 05:13:04PM -0500, Brad wrote:
>On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 09:19:27PM +0200, Stig Are M. Botterli wrote:
>>
>> xmms works fine. However, I've found one peculiar way of playing. If I go
>> to preferences and choose "Esound support", go ou
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 07:21:48PM +0100, Phillip Deackes wrote:
>"Stig Are M. Botterli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> After upgrading to the latest Realplayer (via
>> realplayer_7.0.2.1_i386.deb),
>> I am now told "Cannot open the audio device. Anot
pgrade. I
haven't seen anyone else mentioning this as a problem, so I am at a bit of a
loss as to its cause. Any ideas?
I'm using a GUS Extreme and the (commercial) OSS drivers.
--
Stig Are M. Botterli | Some men see things as they are and ask why.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Others dream things
re fully supported in OSS lite. Not sure though.
Stig Are M. Botterli | "Always let people think you're dumber than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | you really are, they'll underestimate you.
| Then you can obliterate them." -Greg Graffin
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE F
27;t really all that important, as
most cards seem to be supported by the commercial, but fairly
inexpensive, OSS/Linux.
Stig Are M. Botterli | "Always let people think you're dumber than
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| you really are, they'll underestimate you.
| T
gt;> confusing it with the Keenya, which is a Mac clone based on Motorola's
>> Tanzania board.
>
>is it an at or atx format board then? I don't recall seeing anything to
>that effect (but would be very happy if it were atx).
ATX. You will find the technical spcifications
a board.
The reason I am considering this system is that I am also very attracted to the
BeOS and the fact that it will most probably run a CHRP version of Rhapsody.
For a Linux-only system it makes sense to stick to x86, esp. considering the
competition Intel is seeing from Cyrix and AMD.
Stig
anced ET6000 support. You don't need anything else from the
3.2A distribution. Atleast I didn't.
>Lawrence,
Stig Are M. Botterli | "Always let people think you're dumber than
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| you really are, they'll underestimate you.
| Then
a look at http://www.PLiG.org/xwinman/
>Brian
Stig Are M. Botterli |"Always let people think you're dumber then
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| you really are, they'll underestimate you.
| Then you can obliterate them." -Greg Graffin
21 matches
Mail list logo
