Is anyone watching the debian-user-digest? It's broken.
Symptoms include:
1. There was a serveral-day outage last week, then a deluge.
2. Now every digest comes with the same volume and issue number, and the
same (wrong) table of contents of the posts attached.
Anyone know where to report this?
ur ability to set the runlevels to whatever you want?
You have to edit the runlevels now, why would you care about having to
edit the runlevels after they were made to match the LSB? That, at
least, buys some compatibility.
Steve
--
Steven Smolinski => http://arbiter.ca/
ve, make your time!
[Ok, since I have exactly nothing helpful to say, I'm going to just
apologize for that and go on my way...]
Steve
--
Steven Smolinski => http://arbiter.ca/
he error message (didn't cut and paste, no gpm) complained that there
was already a server running on :0. Well, of course! That's why you
pass :1. Perhaps the :1 arg isn't getting through to xinit anymore?
Cluelessly,
Steve
--
Steven Smolinski => http://arbiter.ca/
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 12:23:20AM +0200, Martin F. Krafft wrote:
> also sprach Steven Smolinski (on Mon, 02 Jul 2001 01:46:29PM -0400):
> > That algorithm is one of the purest distillations of beauty I've ever
> > seen. :-) Remember, the perlfaq is far more peer-reviewed
the
currently selected line is random, and was chosen with the proper
probability given the number of lines in the file.
That algorithm is one of the purest distillations of beauty I've ever
seen. :-) Remember, the perlfaq is far more peer-reviewed than almost
any other source of info.
Steve
--
Steven Smolinski => http://arbiter.ca/
&& ($line = $_) while <>;
This has a significant advantage in space over reading the
whole file in. A simple proof by induction is available
upon request if you doubt the algorithm's correctness.
It is a sweet algorithm, and doesn't require you kno
7 matches
Mail list logo
