Re: Another "No devices found" in X problem

2011-02-27 Thread Steve McCarthy
On Sunday 27 Feb 2011, Camaleón wrote: > > I wonder what is the current status for Sandy Bridge in current Debian > releases :-? > > I've read that Intel X driver 2.14.0 does fully support that chipset > (H67) but you seem to be using 2.13.0 and Xorg 1.7.7. Will that combo > work? > > Greetings,

Another "No devices found" in X problem

2011-02-26 Thread Steve McCarthy
Hello, I followed this topic in December when Celejar was having difficulty, but that solution doesn't help me. I recently bought a motherboard w/ H67 chip-set and i5 processor. I managed to purchase it 8 hours before the Intel recall was announced - lucky me. Xorg seems determined to load/ru

Re: Any kmail filtering advice?

2010-12-27 Thread Steve McCarthy
On Monday 27 Dec 2010, Camaleón wrote: > Hum... maybe you are looking for a way of telling Kmail that e-mails > coming from selected users (in address book or by manually selection) > is "ham" (and never tagged as spam, kinda whitelisting in SA > parlance). > > This should be easy to achieve by

Re: Any kmail filtering advice?

2010-12-27 Thread Steve McCarthy
On Friday 24 Dec 2010, Chris Davies wrote: > To do this is straightforward if somewhat fiddly. > > - Enable junk/spam processing (I assume KMail can do this) > - Create a filter for each of the known shops and mailing lists Yes, I think this is essentially the Thunderbird approach. Each accepta

Re: Any kmail filtering advice?

2010-12-23 Thread Steve McCarthy
On Thursday 23 Dec 2010, Lisi wrote: > On Thursday 23 December 2010 21:48:26 Steve McCarthy wrote: > > Has anyone else found a way to defer junk (not SPAM) mail in kmail? > > It can use Spamassassin. (It can integrate it.) But I don't > understand the distinction between

Any kmail filtering advice?

2010-12-23 Thread Steve McCarthy
My GF's disk died and it seemed a perfect time to introduce her to linux/gnu and kde as a msft substitute. I was sadly mistaken. I chose kmail as a substitute for her thunderbird for several reasons. My problem now is duplicating one of thunderbird/ice owl’s features: junk mail control. Sh

Re: Is a Universal Desktop Experience possible?

2009-07-11 Thread Steve McCarthy
On Saturday 11 July 2009, lee wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:24:03PM -0700, SteveM wrote: > > What I'd like is a Universal Desktop Experience, i.e. same kicker > > applets, same konsole profiles, same amarok playlists, same xpad > > postits, etc, whereever I login. I'm a KDE type, but afaict

Re: Is a Universal Desktop Experience possible?

2009-07-11 Thread Steve McCarthy
On Saturday 11 July 2009, Mike Castle wrote: > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 5:13 AM, John Hasler wrote: > > Instead of launching FF directly, I launch a wrapper with picks a > different profile based on the machine name (and whether it's under > VNC or not). I keep one profile as the master, and have a

Re: Is a Universal Desktop Experience possible?

2009-07-11 Thread Steve McCarthy
On Saturday 11 July 2009, Rob Owens wrote: > I typically use Fluxbox and Gnome (and a little LXDE). I haven't used > KDE in years, so I can't comment on it specifically. > > I also haven't NFS mounted /home in quite a while. I remember when I > did it that different versions of Gnome caused me gr

Re: Is a Universal Desktop Experience possible?

2009-07-11 Thread Steve McCarthy
On Friday 10 July 2009, Rob Owens wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:24:03PM -0700, SteveM wrote: > > What I'd like is a Universal Desktop Experience, i.e. same kicker > > applets, same konsole profiles, same amarok playlists, same xpad > > postits, etc, whereever I login. I'm a KDE type, but afa