Bruce -
The roaring penguin client is by far the easiest to use - I successfully ran it
for over two years with Verizon in NYC. As to DNS servers, I had the addresses
so used them in my resolv.conf file. The documentation is excellent as well.
good luck.
- Steve
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 08:50:
Folks -
Looks like I was missing the dhclient-script file. I did a new apt-get,
upgraded the package and it works like a charm. Thanks for all of your help and
suggestions.
- Steve
Marcin -
I didn't have any other box connected, and I did a full power recycle with
reset on the modem (the process works when I test on another machine)
- Steve
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 11:17:42AM -0500, Kurc, Marcin A. wrote:
> Did you have any other box connected to your cable modem before yo
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 03:13:38PM -0800, Jeff wrote:
> Stephen Nosal, 2002-Mar-10 15:51 -0500:
> > Well, folks, I'm still having no success here. Here's an excerpt from my
> > syslog files:
> >
> > Mar 10 15:24:38 lambic dhclient-2.2.x: send_packet: Netwo
the network is good, but I'm really at a loss right now...
Thoughts?
- Stephen Nosal
NY, NY
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 06:13:15PM +0100, Bjorn Erik Gravingen wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 February 2002 20:16, dman wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 05:32:53PM -0600, hanasaki wrote:
>
ntly at a loss as to where to look.
Can anyone point me in the right direction? I'm quite frustrated at this point
in time trying doing something that should be so simple I'm sure I've been hit
with the stupid stick.
Thanks.
- Steve
Stephen Nosal
New York, NY
System details:
k
Folks -
There was a thread on this last week. To summarized, due to a disputed bug
in ppp, you need to make sure that the MTU settings are 1500 on your masq
box. If you're running pppoe, there is an overhead cost, and you must change
the MTU to that of the pppoe connection (1492 in my case) on all
l to
do this at this time.
I changed my MTU from 1500 to 1492 and everything works like a charm. This
ppp 'issue' and pppoe's required mtu of 1492 is a giant pain - I hope it
gets worked out somewhere.
Thanks for the help.
- Steve
-----Original Message-
From: Stephen Nosal
t a shot tonight and see what happens. Is there the chance it's
somewhere else?
- Steve
-Original Message-
From: Mike McGuire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:07 PM
To: Stephen Nosal
Cc: Debian User List (E-mail)
Subject: Re: ipmasq/ipchains/reading TFM
On M
Folks -
I'm running a potato box (2.2.19) as a firewall/gateway for my tiny (2
machine) home network. Most everything is working fine, but my internal
network box can't see certain web pages that are visible from the gateway
box. Not all http traffic is blocked, but site such as the page after
log
reason somewhere... now my curiosity is peaked.
- Steve
-Original Message-
From: Michael Heldebrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 4:08 PM
To: Stephen Nosal
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: dist upgrade potato to woody 2.2 to 2.4 kernel
I'm inter
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 2:11 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: dist upgrade potato to woody 2.2 to 2.4 kernel
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 12:49:09PM -0400, Stephen Nosal wrote:
> so, is it possible that the standard build requires a ramdisk, but if you
> 'rol
I'm also still confused why you don't
want to compile your own kernel.
--mike
On 06 Aug 2001 12:49:09 -0400, Stephen Nosal wrote:
> so, is it possible that the standard build requires a ramdisk, but if you
> 'roll your own' it is not necessary?
>
> If the above is t
so, is it possible that the standard build requires a ramdisk, but if you
'roll your own' it is not necessary?
If the above is true, and I wish to install the standard build kernel, how
do I go about putting together this ramdisk and configuring it correctly? is
it as simple as an additional line
Original Message-
From: Michael Heldebrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 10:52 AM
To: Stephen Nosal
Cc: 'Debian "User List (E-mail)'"
Subject: RE: dist upgrade potato to woody 2.2 to 2.4 kernel
What type of controller is the hard drive on at the
;t find root at
hda2. Root is located at /dev/hda2. There is no boot prompt to pass the
process additional parameters.
- Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 10:48 AM
To: Stephen Nosal; debian-user@lists.debian.org
Su
brant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 10:34 AM
To: Debian User List (E-mail)
Subject: Re: dist upgrade potato to woody 2.2 to 2.4 kernel
What does the error say? Has the new 2.4 kernel been installed and
booted?
--mike
On 06 Aug 2001 10:18:49 -0400, Stephen Nosal
Folks -
I've been having a terrible time attempting to upgrade my perfectly good
potato installation to the new woody
distribution including the 2.4 kernel. Each time I attempt to install the
kernel, I get a statement regarding initrd, and the upgrade fails.
I've looked high and low for documenta
Folks -
Help me out here - I understand it is now possible to compile ppp and pppoe
in the 2.4.x kernel as opposed to running a pppoe client like roaring
penguin. Unfortunately, I have been unable to find any documentation on
this. Can someone point me in the right direction please?
Thank
- Stev
19 matches
Mail list logo
