> Run the database on the machine that stores the files and perform
> database access remotely over the net instead. ?
yes, but this doesn't resolve the performance issue with nfs
> Can you partition the files into 2 different shares? Put the database
> files in one share and access them using "sync", and put the rest of the
> files in a different share, with no "sync"?
this could be a solution, but I want to understand why is it so slow and fix
that
> You could try removing the "sync" option, just as an experiment, to see
> how much it is contributing to the slowdown.
If I don't use sync I got around 300MB/s (tested with 600MB-file) .. that's ok
(far from great), but since there are database files on the nfs it can cause
file/database corr
> You could test with noatime if you don't need access times.
> And perhaps with lazytime instead of relatime.
Mountoptions are:
type zfs (rw,xattr,noacl)
I get you point, but when you look at my fio output, the performance is quiet
good
> Could you provide us
> nfsstat -v
server:
nfsstat -v
Serv
nfs performance
>
> On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 10:13 +0100, Stefan K wrote:
> > Hello guys,
> >
> > I hope someone can help me with my problem.
> > Our NFS performance ist very bad, like ~20MB/s, mountoption looks
> > like that:
>
> Are both sides agreeing on M
Hello guys,
I hope someone can help me with my problem.
Our NFS performance ist very bad, like ~20MB/s, mountoption looks like that:
rw,relatime,sync,vers=4.2,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,local_lock=none
The NFS server (debian 12) is a ZFS Files
Hello Debian guys,
I hope someone can help me with my problem because I'm a little bit frustrated
and I don't have absolutely no clue how to fix that.
I have a Debian 12 based print server running, all printers are connected via
IPP which works so far but it takes a while if we start printing m
that is sad
any other ideas how can I done that? (but I will create a new thread for that
On Friday, March 5, 2021 10:55:36 AM CET didier gaumet wrote:
> Hello
>
> from what I understand, Bulleye's version of Systemd is now frozen to 247:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2021/0
Hello,
is there a chance that systemd 248 get in bullseye?
Systemd248 allow to unlocking encrypted volumes via FIDO2, which is very
usefull nowadays.
best regards
Stefan
rules, my boss and I favour a simple
opensource-solution with just IP/Port access-rules
On Thursday, February 27, 2020 2:19:55 AM CET tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On 26/02/2020 17:54, Stefan K wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > we're looking for a nftables gui/fronten
Hello,
we're looking for a nftables gui/frontend.
We want to create a simple firewall (port/ip blocking) I took a look at
vuurmuur[1], but it just support iptables. Does exist some other solutions?
We don't want to config it via cli or config-files.
Thanks for help!
best regards
Stefan
[1] ht
gnore it, or must it do something to allow the main CPU to run?
>
> On Monday, July 01, 2019 04:27:48 AM Stefan K wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > So I don't get any answers from the debian-user-german mailinglist I ask
> > you ;)
> >
> > sh
01-138956.html
best regards
Stefan
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: alternative Firmware für BMC's
Date: Tuesday, June 25, 2019, 3:21:03 PM CEST
From: Stefan K
To: debian-user-ger...@lists.debian.org
Hallo in die Runde,
kurze Frage: wenn ich [1] lese, steht dort dass diverse
I solved this issue by installing the latest backport kernel
On Sunday, May 26, 2019 7:57:50 PM CEST deloptes wrote:
> Stefan K wrote:
>
> > I also try to use _netdev as mountoptions, but it didn't work.
> > Has anyone an idea how to solve this?
>
> I use defaults,r
Hello,
we've some problems with Debian stretch which try to mount nfs4 shares at
boot-time, sometimes it works and sometimes not. If its not mounting during
start I can mount it after I login without problems.
A successfull (re)boot look like [1] and a (re)boot which doesn't mount the
shares l
e wrote:
> On 2/28/2019 9:49 AM, Stefan K wrote:
> > Hallo,
> >
> > we have our own ntp-server which is running Ubuntu 14.04.LTS.
> > This Server works fine:
> > ntpq -pn
> > remote refid
Hallo,
we have our own ntp-server which is running Ubuntu 14.04.LTS.
This Server works fine:
ntpq -pn
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==
*178.63.9.110129.69.1.153 2 u
Hi Long Wind,
I use 60.4.0esr on Debian Stretch on a Lenovo T460, bevor I use Google Chrome
(cause it can handle a lot of open tabs, and use for every tab a seperate
process). With the 60.4.0esr everything works fine, at the moment I've more
than 70 tabs open (in my "main" firefox window) and e
Hi,
Debian will be upgrade to Firefox 60.2 esr.,it will be available at 2018-09-05
more information about this:
https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.html#browser-security
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815006 (chapter "About
stable releas
Hello,
did you really need the hardware controller? I suggest to use Software/MD raid,
ob btrfs with raid1 or zfs with raidz1
On Wednesday, August 22, 2018 11:41:08 AM CEST Martin LEUSCH wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I have a NFS server with a hardware RAID5 on 3 HDD of 6 TB. I have a
> system partiti
-Write features
yep you're right, specially the Snapshot thing, you can use it before you make
upgrades (I think the new Linux Mint version does that).
best regards
Stefan
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. August 2018 um 16:50 Uhr
> Von: "Matthew Crews"
> An: "Stefan K" , deb
um 21:09 Uhr
> Von: "Matthew Crews"
> An: "Anders Andersson"
> Cc: "Debian users mailing list"
> Betreff: Re: does btrfs have a future? (was: feature)
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On August 14, 2018 6:54 AM, Anders Andersson wrote:
&g
oohh sh**,
sorry for that, but I guess your know what I mean ;)
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. August 2018 um 15:54 Uhr
> Von: "Anders Andersson"
> An: "Debian users mailing list"
> Betreff: Re: does btrfs have a feature?
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:26 PM, St
Hello,
I'm just just curious.
In the beginning of btrfs, most blogs, websites, magazins said btrfs will be
THE next standard linux filesystem, so now after araound 10years it doesn't
look so good, or?
Who use btrfs in production? What do you think - does have btrfs a feature
(because ZFS on
Hi,
today i tried it, but it didn't work:
on my nfs-test system I use the 2x1GB interfaces
showmount -e
and
showmount -e
shows me the exports
so now i mount the nfs-share on a server with 10G Interfaces(bond), when i
mount it with the second NFS-IP, I got an error "mount.nfs: mount(2): Device o
25 matches
Mail list logo
