Re: secure kernel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. Why shouldn't I use kernel-image-2.4.18-1-386 insted of kernel-image-2.4.18-bf2.4. It provides a better performence to me i586 computer ? kernel-image-2.4.18-bf2.4 works fine on my machine ;) On Wednesday 11 of June 2003 03:24, Hubert Chan wrote

Re: secure kernel

yes...I have downloaded the kernel as I wrote. kernel-image-2.4.18-bf2.4 so, this one is secure ? On Tuesday 10 of June 2003 01:28, Hubert Chan wrote: > You'll want to look at the latest DSA: > http://www.debian.org/security/2003/dsa-311 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

secure kernel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello. I am just new to debian LInux after spending some time on redhat and mandrake. Debian is cool but I have just one important question. I just installed debian 3.0r1 woody to my machine with bf24 option so I have 2.4.18 kernel on my machine right

test

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+5QjCmVxi/0Pw2OoRAsFNAJ0ZTXS6tBBcxW2pRuFDotLEa10p0ACghSMO 4xsDKBnv9FqwtUQfSSM3JlM= =bWyQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subje