Hi all,
This did not make it into 2.6.21? Will it get into 2.6.22?
Well this does not depend on me. But this is already in mm:
+ x86-msr-add-support-for-safe-variants.patch added to -mm tree
(this night came some mail, that it has been added - same came few days back)
Rudolf
--
To UNSUBSC
Alexey,
Maybe OpenVZ needs both safe and unsafe variants in msr-on-cpu?
>> On URL bellow is current version of coretemp driver.
>>
>> http://ssh.cz/~ruik/patches/
>>
>> What was fixed? I fixed the issues Jean pointed out, I created separate patch
>> for ...msr_safe stuff.
>>
> In arch/i386/lib
Hello all,
I'm CCing all interested parties, if some isn't please tell!
On URL bellow is current version of coretemp driver.
http://ssh.cz/~ruik/patches/
I do not own this CPU (happy user of overclocked Opteron ;) So it would be great
if someone can give it testing. We need to test:
CONFIG_SM
Hello all,
> I'm just wondering if it is right to export the functions msr_read and
> msr_write from arch/i386/kernel/msr.c, or if it would be better to put
> these functions in arch/i386/lib/msr-on-cpu.c with rdmsr_on_cpu and
> wrmsr_on_cpu.
I'm fixing this, please stay tuned. I will CC you in ne
4 matches
Mail list logo
