I'm running Debian 2.1 (slink) with some occasional packages from potato
(recompiled from the sources). Is there any reason why the diald package
has not been updated since 0.16.5 ?
I don't know if it works better or anything, but I debianized the
diald-0.99 tarball and installed it and now I'm us
I really gave up months ago getting the fm synth on my Creative Labs
ViBRA16X PnP sound card working. A while ago I got the debian source
package for playmidi_2.3-22 to find the *.o3 and *.sb patches, but never
could figure anything out.
I just happened to tinker around a bit with the source packa
On Thu, 20 May 1999, Carl Mummert wrote:
> >> 1 message for linus159 at mail.server.se (4122 octets).
> >> reading message 1 of 1 (4122 octets) .fetchmail: SMTP listner
> >> doesn't like recipient address '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> >> fetchmail: can't even send to linus
> >> fetchmail: SMTP transaction
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> Dows anyone know of any programs that will allow me to capture what's on
> the desktop?
xwd, xwdtopnm, xwud are useful tools..
(Included in xbase-clients)
Roy
Unsolicited commercial email with be billed at $350/message
Roy Larsen, [EMAIL PRO
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Chris Hoover wrote:
> 2. How can I have exim dump any mail that passes through all my filters into
> a
> special misc folder? I don't want any mail to end up in my
> /var/spool/mail/user file.
Put at the end of your exim filter (.forward) file:
if not delivered then
sa
On Fri, 26 Mar 1999, O. Niepolt wrote:
> which _is_ the standard kernel for slink? Would it make sense to use 2.2
> or to use ALSA? Where could I find 2.2 kernel debs? I'm asking this
I have an SB16PnP and I recently posted the instructions on how I did the
sound on my system to this debian-user
On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, Pollywog wrote:
> It is a proper domain, the problem is that most spammers do not use real
> e-mail addresses, so we have no way of knowing whether [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
> the originator of the spam. I believe I already deleted the spam, so I cannot
> check the headers again t
On Tue, 23 Mar 1999, Mono wrote:
> I'm having major problems with my printer. Parport detects it at startup
> and does nothing. I've tried putting it's address in the lilo command
> line with no luck. It's listed under /proc at port 0 with no information
> after probing. Is the 700 series simp
On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, Craig T. Hancock wrote:
> I don't undersand what I am doing wrong if anyone can help I would greatly
> appricate
> it
If I am getting this right, you have a Soundblaster 16 *Plug and Play* ?
In any case, that's what I have. If that is correct, you might need to
compile all
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Nils Rennebarth wrote:
> There appears to be a long outstanding bug in the S3 X servers that
> completely locks up the keyboard, although the system still runs fine,
> mouse can be moved, starting programs by mouse and menu works, even
> cut and paste some text into an xterm w
On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> I have couple of questions about upgrading my kernel to 2.2.3.
>
> I downloaded the full source and went through all the steps to compile,
> but when I rebooted I received an error telling me that modules.dep was
> empty. I took a look at /lib/modules/2
On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, Mark Phillips wrote:
> I've just done an upgrade to slink, but when I go into dselect I
> observe that there are a number of obsolete packages:
>
> --- Obsolete and local packages present on system ---
> - Obsolete/local Required packages -
> --- Obsole
I have a Creative Labs Soundblaster 16 PnP, or model SB4171 (I believe it
is referred to as model CT4171 by the user manual), and I cannot figure
out how to make midi work.
It works fine in DOS/WfW3.11 and WAV files work in linux. It seems to get
detected fine with isapnp.
My system is a 486DX33 w
I am running Debian 2.0 (slink) on a 486DX33 with only 10MB RAM and my
computer is often working hard (having to make use of a lot of virtual
memory). I am using a three-button mouse running the MouseSystems
protocol in Xwindows and I am running gpm with -t msc.
As long as there is not a heavy loa
Is it possible to re-size the extended partition without losing the
logical drives ?
I am running Debian 2.0 (slink) on a 1.6 GB HDD with the partition table
as follows:
/dev/hda1 DOS200MB
/dev/hda2 / 150MB
/dev/hda3 /tmp 150MB
/dev/hda4 EXT
/dev/hda5 swap64MB
/dev/hda6
15 matches
Mail list logo
