On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 07:38:06PM -0500, Alec Smith wrote:
> If you really want Debian and glibc2.1, the best and easiest option
> is to use unstable for now.
a) Will potato (that's next, right?) be glibc2.1 based?
b) Is unstable what is being prepared for potato?
c) What is the preferred metho
I have searched the archives for this, and have found (very
surprisingly) nothing -- perhaps I searched wrong?
I would like to upgrade my 2.1r2 system to glibc2.1, and dependent
packages. I would like to do so such that I maintain the consistency
of my package database.
In otherwords, I want to
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 09:13:53PM -0500, Brad wrote:
>
> The only problem with this method is that it will forget any holds you've
> placed.
Brad, thanks very much for such a specific set of steps.
Unforunately, I went through them, and they didn't seem to make a
difference. After doing the ste
I have somehow put dselect into a mode where it thinks there are many
packages to be removed, and many to be installed -- it got like this
despite the fact that I have not been through selecting packages for
removal and installation.
I believe it ended up like this as a result of my playing with
4 matches
Mail list logo
