On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 01:56:23PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> RobertHoltzman put forth on 1/10/2010 1:01 AM:
> > One of the Alpine (ex)devs claims it's true. If I ever get the time I'll
> > see about testing it one of the distros on my desktop box. Intuitively
> &
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 08:09:57PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> RobertHoltzman put forth on 1/9/2010 5:45 PM:
> > On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 10:27:33AM -0200, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> >> Klistvud wrote:
> >>> I've heard maildir is more robust th
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 10:27:33AM -0200, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> Klistvud wrote:
> > I've heard maildir is more robust than mbox in that regard. Can anybody
> > confirm if that's true or not?
> >
>
> I'd say so. Since each message is a file, if one file gets corrupted
> only that messa
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 09:26:54AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
>
> Is this really true? Is the total amount of upstream bandwidth that
> spam consumes really that expensive (eSpam in e-mail started to become
> a problem when the Internet was opened up to the general public in the
> mid-1990s. It grew e
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 05:20:26AM +, s. keeling wrote:
> RobertHoltzman :
> >
> > > Educating them it always better than "shooting" them ;-)
> >
> > I dunno, thinning the herd has its merits :-)
>
> Trust me, ya gotta be careful with that k
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 04:32:28PM +0100, Bernard wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have made a very light use of mutt for several years, for special
> purposes only. So I can't say that I am very familiar with it. On my old
> systems (RedHat 7.2) it was based on sendmail for sending mail. Then, on
> Debian
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 11:55:59AM +, Camale�n wrote:
>
> Educating them it always better than "shooting" them ;-)
I dunno, thinning the herd has its merits :-)
--
Bob Holtzman
GPG key ID = 8D549279
If you think you're getting free lunch
check the price of the beer.
signature.asc
Descript
7 matches
Mail list logo
