Yes, blowfish would be a good choice if doing this.
-Peter
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 04:43:45PM +0100, Lubos Vrbka wrote:
> >FTP would probably be the fastest, but scp (file transfer over SSH) is
> >probably already on both machines if they're both Linux. PuTTY is an
> >excellent SSH/SCP client
Debian's /etc/network/interfaces configuration file supports checking
for charactaristics of an interface before bringing it up.
/usr/share/doc/ifupdown/examples/network-interfaces.gz has the skinny
on this.
-Peter
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 12:01:14PM +0100, Ketil Froyn wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I ha
nmap is all you need. The manpage will tell you everything about it
you need to know. If you can't find an open port then you may want to
consider running an ssh tunnel (man ssh and look for -R and -L
options).
Even worse running TCP/IP over your ssh connection with a pppd and
Magosányi Árpád's pt
As far as advantages, most of them should be called 'potential'
advantages and are outlined quite well in some of the documents
referred to by some other replies. It's a remarkably interesting
project, but (besides the odd story I've heard to run a web server
just to show it can be done) it's not
It would be an interesting (and probably not too difficult) task to
implement this with procmail and a couple scripts to hardlink emails
into different Maildir directories. Then pick your client of choice.
In my case I'd pick mutt, which has limitless options for shortcuts.
-Peter
On Fri, Jan 20
VMware should work fine for you. I have used GSX to run production
servers and it has been very stable.
I don't use the workstation version very extensively but I have
friends that have had some serious file corruption when running XP
with it. It works fine usually, just be sure to backup your dat
This is the document I've used multiple times when setting this type
of environment up.
http://talk.trekweb.com/~jasonb/articles/exim_maildir_imap.shtml
-Peter
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 05:06:03PM -0500, Ropetin wrote:
> I hope I'm asking this question in the right place. If not please let
> me
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 03:37:25PM +, Noah Dain wrote:
> On 1/18/06, Peter McAlpine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Security feature or not... when I'm troubleshooting I sometimes want
> > this disabled. If 'xhost +' no longer disables all access control,
Security feature or not... when I'm troubleshooting I sometimes want
this disabled. If 'xhost +' no longer disables all access control, I'd
be interested in hearing the new way to it.
Thanks,
-Peter
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 12:17:27AM +, Martin OConnor wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 17:29 -050
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 19:01, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> I no longer have a /var/log/boot although I remember having one, what
> does its presence depend on?
>
> Hugo.
>
[19:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -S /var/log/boot
dpkg: /var/log/boot not found.
oh.
Maybe when I dist-upgraded to unstable it ch
Hello,
I recently deleted "/var/log/boot", and then did a "touch
/var/log/boot". However, I have rebooted multiple times and the log
remains empty. Does anyone have ideas where I could start looking for
solutions to this problem?
ls excerpt:
-rw-r--r--1 root root0 Jan 5 16:11
Maybe you should consider switching to ext3 or some other journaling
fs.
-peter
> "Sandip" == Sandip P Deshmukh writes:
>
> Sandip> hello all! i use debian 3.0, filesystem is ext3.
>
> Sandip> i realize that it checks the partitition after mounting it
> Sandip> for 20 times,
12 matches
Mail list logo
