w about?
thanks in advance,
--
__
\/ o\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Edinburgh fetish club Permission \ /
/\__/ Paul Crowley Nov 8 http://www.hedonism.demon.co.uk/permission /~\
;hold"
instructions on everything and letting apt-get do its funky stuff, or
are there hidden dependencies it's worth handling by hand? Any
special benefits to this change, besides dselect looking happier?
thanks in advance,
--
__
\/ o\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Edinburgh fetish
ve
different secure places, arranging that three of the pieces are needed
to reconstruct the key.
--
__
\/ o\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Edinburgh fetish club Permission \ /
/\__/ Paul Crowley Nov 8 http://www.hedonism.demon.co.uk/permission /~\
If users have been idle for too long, or have been logged on
for too long, it will warn them and log them out appropriately.
--
__
\/ o\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Edinburgh fetish club Permission \ /
/\__/ Paul Crowley Nov 8 http://www.hedonism.demon.co.uk/permission /~\
ate that mostly people
would choose dancing elephants over security every time right up until
the point they get hacked, but if you prefer to be wise before the
event then every element in your path will be absolute.
--
__
\/ o\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Edinburgh fetish club Permission \ /
/\__/ Paul Crowley Nov 8 http://www.hedonism.demon.co.uk/permission /~\
bit and it improves
your security. It used to be the case that people put "." in their
PATH as a matter of course, but the practice died out when people
started to worry about the security implications.
I'm surprised that you say no-one else said this...
--
__
\/ o\ [EMAIL P
__o /\_ _ \\o (_)\__/o (_)
> --- _`\<,__`\<,__>(_) (_)/<_\_| \ _|/' \/
> -- (_)/ (_) (_)/ (_) (_)(_) (_)(_)' _\o_
> ~~~
Nice .sig!
--
__
\/ o\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Edinburgh fetish club Permission \
7 matches
Mail list logo