On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 15:56:11 +0200
wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 03:19:19PM +0200, Roger Price wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Aug 2023, Hans wrote:
>>
>> > find .mozilla -name favicons.sqlite -ls
>> > 1512492 2144 -rw-r--r-- 1 myusername myusernama 2195456 Aug
>> > 21 13:29 .mozilla/firefox/gs0gkg
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 06:05:18 +0200
wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 05:59:11PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>> The only case I can see in which such offloading would
>> be unethical is where the website operator is somehow engaging in
>> deceptive behavior, but assuming it is not [...]
>
>A p
On Sun, 07 May 2023 21:36:32 +0200
Michel Verdier wrote:
>And beside the fact we are on a debian forum, and that debian is much
>better than fedora and arch linux, all this don't answer the main
>problem : there is no package called neodim. If this is this neodim :
>
>https://github.com/zbirenbau
On Sun, 02 Apr 2023 22:42:14 +0200
Michel Verdier wrote:
>IMO style is perhaps important for development. But libs et regex are
>more important for sysadmin. I use python if a library is there or if I
>need to interface another python program. In example mutagen for
>covering mp3 files. And I u
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 09:35:34 -0500
wrote:
>Am I correct in assuming that package formats like Flatpak, Snap and
>Appimage, because they package up everything with the executable, would
>consume more system memory? One of the reasons to use these formats is
>to avoid library version mismatches, an
Hello!
On Fri, 04 Nov 2022 20:30:51 +0530
Bharatvaj P H wrote:
>vimscript9
> feels like a bad decision, it is incompatible with vimscript2 and
> does not match performance with lua.
Probably not many scripting languages do. But then I'm not sure
performance is the be-all and end-all when it com
On Sat, 20 Aug 2022 13:26:14 +0100
Brian wrote:
>Reasons for the perceived "ignored" status might be:
>
> * The maintainer judges that the bug affects very few users.
> * The maintainer does not have the resources to deal with the bug.
> * A solution is already in hand and awaiting upload to unst
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 13:31:11 +0100
Joe wrote:
>
>Yes, I was using it a few years ago, and a new Debian kernel made the
>guest additions unusable. I forget what I needed them for, but gave up
>on VB then. I dare say a later version of the VB additions fixed the
>problem, but there was no knowing h
On Sun, 8 May 2022 09:20:25 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Rick Thomas [2022-05-07 19:47:57] wrote:
> > > According to the ISC webpage:
> > >> ISC has ended development on the ISC DHCP client as of early
> > >> 2022. This client implementation is no longer maintained and
> >
On Fri, 03 Sep 2021 20:50:06 +0200
Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>Version 91 is only in experimental.
>
Probably blocked by some Rust stuff again. Anyone who's waiting and if
possible please get a flatpak and get on with your life. Debian is
providing that for a reason, too. We've been at the same point
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 16:04:00 -0700
Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
>Looking for recommendations for a lightweight email client that will
>handle HTML as well as plain text to replace Claws-Mail. Have been
>using Claws-Mail for years and before it Sylpheed. Claws used to have
>a basic HTML plugin render
On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 01:10:34 +0200
aprekates wrote:
> In my case both:
>
> $ dpkg -l w*
>
> and
>
> $ dpkg -l 'w*'
>
> will report the same list
>
Hi!
I'm getting the same sort of output and it seems to me these are
packages, dpkg knows about providing some virtual packages,
that something
12 matches
Mail list logo
