Bob Proulx writes:
> Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> Pascal Hambourg writes:
>> > Nikolaus Rath a écrit :
>> > It appears that the client has a private addresse and the server has a
>> > public address. So I guess that there is a NAT device between them, and
>>
Pascal Hambourg writes:
> Hello,
>
> Nikolaus Rath a écrit :
>>
>> I'm having trouble with an internet connection that seems to randomly
>> "freeze" arbitrary tcp connections when they have not been used for a
>> while. The connections stay est
Hi,
I'm having trouble with an internet connection that seems to randomly
"freeze" arbitrary tcp connections when they have not been used for a
while. The connections stay established, but no data is coming through.
When this happens, netstat still shows the connection status as
`ESTABLISHED` on
Michael Biebl writes:
> On 11.12.2012 19:00, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have created a udev rule to set the owner of a specific block device:
>>
>> SUBSYSTEM=="block",
>> ENV{DM_UUID}=="LVM-yYuoI8k05GWxZnz9BeEIwPUGGeo
Hello,
I have created a udev rule to set the owner of a specific block device:
SUBSYSTEM=="block",
ENV{DM_UUID}=="LVM-yYuoI8k05GWxZnz9BeEIwPUGGeojzF3dZZmXTYRqC051Tllj76OHdDlzYhKZUu7u",
OWNER="1000"
If I disable and re-enable this logical volume with lvchange, it gets
created with the correct own
On 10/10/2012 10:51 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to add a patch to the stock Debian wheezy kernel. According to
> http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html, there are
> two ways to do this.
>
> Either I can install the linux-sourc
Hello,
I'd like to add a patch to the stock Debian wheezy kernel. According to
http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html, there are
two ways to do this.
Either I can install the linux-source package (apt-get install
linux-source), unzip the .tar.bz, apply my patch and run 'ma
Camaleón writes:
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:03:14 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>
>> Camaleón writes:
>>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:31:11 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ubuntu has a "ppa-purge" script that not just removes Launchpad PPAs
>&g
Camaleón writes:
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:19:26 -0400, Tom H wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:31:11 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ubuntu has a "ppa-purge" script that not just
Camaleón writes:
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:31:11 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>
>> Ubuntu has a "ppa-purge" script that not just removes Launchpad PPAs
>> from sources.list, but also automatically reverts any packages installed
>> from that PPA to the versions
Hello,
Ubuntu has a "ppa-purge" script that not just removes Launchpad PPAs
from sources.list, but also automatically reverts any packages installed
from that PPA to the versions available in the official archives.
Has anyone ever written something similar for Debian? I'm thinking of a
script tha
Camaleón writes:
>> I have trouble entering keyboard compositions in many, but not all
>> applications. For example, when entering dead_iota + a (which I have
>> configured to give adiaresis in ~/.XCompose) gnome terminal just beeps
>> and does nothing. Other affected applications are gedit, icedo
Camaleón writes:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:14:55 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>
>> I have trouble entering keyboard compositions in many, but not all
>> applications. For example, when entering dead_iota + a (which I have
>> configured to give adiaresis in ~/.XCompose) g
Hello,
I have trouble entering keyboard compositions in many, but not all
applications. For example, when entering dead_iota + a (which I have
configured to give adiaresis in ~/.XCompose) gnome terminal just beeps
and does nothing. Other affected applications are gedit, icedove and
LibreOffice. Em
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." writes:
> On Sunday 15 February 2009 13:06:29 Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> I expected that it would be pretty easy to spot these modifications.
>> So I did exactly the above and then tried to "detect" my changes.
>>
>> I first loo
Hello,
I recently though about the least sophisticated way to introduce a
backdoor into a system if a already had a root shell. My naive
approach would be to
a) create a setuid root shell somewhere in the fs,
or
b) modify an existing setuid binary to grant me root access
(e.g. when invoce
16 matches
Mail list logo
