Tim Ruehsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Nic,
>
> do you *really* need SKAS? UML works without SKAS, but I heard it should be
> somewhat slower without it. I have 2 UML envs running on my SID desktop (an
> old SID and a very old SuSE system). They are pretty well used by my
> collegues as d
as patches.
There is the package:
kernel-patch-skas
But this seems to apply to the old kernel-*** packages and not the new
linux-*** ones.
Does anyone know what I have to do to get a skas host kernel?
Nic Ferrier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
When I do an:
apt-get update
I'm getting this:
W: GPG error: http://ftp.ticklers.org etch Release: The following signatures
couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY
010908312D230C5F
W: GPG error: http://ftp.ticklers.org testing Release: The following
sign
My question is: is this a bug? Should I report it?
I can't find any live bug that refers to the boot-floppies.
Sorry if this is a dumb question.
Nic Ferrier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nic Ferrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You can fix emacs by using
> >
> >apt-get install termcap-compat
> >
> >
> > It's about time that emacs supported terminfo but unfo
Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I may have jacked up my terminfo database.
>
> I built emacs from sources today. A very recent beta of emacs-21.
> Something like the rpm commands `rpm -qf ' will tell
> exactly what package a file belongs to. Then with that info you can
> say r
ltdl0 1.3.3-9.1
libltdl0-dev 1.3.3-9.1
libncurses44.2-9
libncurses55.0-6.0potato1
libncurses5-de 5.0-6.0potato1
libnet-telnet- 3.01-2
libstdc++2.10 2.95.2-13
libstdc++2.10- 2.95.2-13
libstdc++2.9-g 2.91.66-4
Please, please, please help. I just don't know what to do next.
Nic Ferrier
I'm not sure if this is the right place to raise this but I think
there may be a problem with the current stable.
I've just upgraded a debian stable (i386) and got some very strange
config... 24 package were upgraded and apt went into config mode.
Normal enough... but what it wanted me to config
el) machines I have here.
I'm very confused. Please help.
Nic Ferrier
help please?
Nic Ferrier
le to do anything about this...
I realise that the potato distrib is unstable and that I have to
accept the thing being a bit wobbly but this seems to be more than
just wobbly packages... it seems to be the apt system itself.
Can anyone help please?
Nic Ferrier
s
with key tables)
This is dashed inconveniant... it's strange though because it's fine
outside of X.
It would be great if someone could do me a favour and test this on
their system to see if they get the same problem... if it's a problem
I can find out how to fix it.
Thanks very much.
Nic Ferrier
12 matches
Mail list logo
