<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> All very good points except alot of people including myself prefer
> compiling their own kernels for various reasons. But at the same time run
> into packages that "require" the debian package version even though you
> have same or newer self compiled kernel installed.
x support in general still has some issues. gcc
doesn't doesn't have as sophisticated an optimizer, for instance.
Depending on what you intend to do, this may or may not be an issue.
Mike.
--
Michael Alan Dorman Head of Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens) writes:
> The uncompressed one was used to make psdatabase. I don't know if it is
> still needed.
The installation process deletes the uncompressed image.
It would be interesting to see if there was a way one could use the
compressed image for that, though.
Mike.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens) writes:
> If you can do so, please try running your system with the date in the year
> 2000 for a while. Richard Stallman asked if we had tested that GNU software
> is free of year-2000 problems, and I think it's a good idea. Fortunately
> we don't have too many COB
Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You are confusing ld.so with gcc. The compiler/linker doesn't search
> /usr/local, you would need to direct it to look there. What you need to
> put into /usr/local/lib is the shared libraries used by ld.so during
> program loading. This path is on the lis
Adam Shand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >You can download them from the rtr.com site, and then you just need to
> >add to the httpd.conf for Apache (or the equivalent on other httpds):
> I found the old debian package and got it to work by downgrading.
Yes, but you've just broken several other pa
Jeff Shilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Minicom doesn't recover when I have partial files.
Well, technically, it's lrzsz that acts that way.
This is because there is no recovery code in lrzsz (at least, there
wasn't any last time I looked really hard---however I no longer
actively use zmodem, and
Douglas Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are there any such emacs-based MUA's that support IMAP? Does gnus do
> so?
Someone is working on an IMAP backend for gnus, but it is not, to the
best of my knowledge, there yet.
I will mention that if you use dxpc, emacs-with-X over a PPP link is
quite
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm surprised at the big push towards lprng because it seems just
> as hard to configure, the documentation seems disorganised, etc.
Well, I'll agree that the documentation isn't a work of art, but I,
personally, have found it no harder to configure th
Martin Alonso Soto Jacome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> naoma: ~$ java
> java was not found in /usr/lib/jdk/i586/bin/java
> naoma: ~$ jdb
> java was not found in /usr/lib/jdk/i586/bin/java
> naoma: ~$ javac
> java was not found in /usr/lib/jdk/i586/bin/java
>
> Any clues on what the problem may be
Zachary DeAquila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> anyone feel like taking a shot at a libpthreads package? I'm
> thinking of the kernel threads library, not the userthreads one
> that's already there. Or is it already incorported into some base
> package someplace?
Done, just hasn't worked its way
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens) writes:
> Mike Neuffer, Bdale Garbee, Miquel and Danny of Cistron, and I have
> all purchased DEC ALPHA Multias in the past two weeks. This bodes well
> for a 1.2 release on them.
You can add me to the list, as well as a couple of other Debian users
here at UM.
I
Ricardo Kleemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So what would you say is the best performing SCSI controller (in wide or
> ultra flavor)? Is the 2940UW the best?
I have no benchmarks, but I am partial to the DPT controllers. I've
got the Fast SCSI-II (PM2124) in my desktop machine, and the Fast-W
Fundamental <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okay, how do people add virtual domains using apache, i tried the following
> - i added this line to the S20apache runtime file;
>
> ifconfig eth0:1 servername up
>
> but this didnt work.
ifconfig eth0:0 111.111.111.111
route add -host 111.111.111.111 de
Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My suggestion of tagging the files as conffiles was thought as a solution
> to your problem, if the files change.
That's the problem, though---it's not a solution at all. Consider if
the application introduces a new resource, without which the
appli
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, a sysadmin might want to have a way to make a global override.
> For example, to configure Mosaic to use a proxy. Wouldn't it be nice
> if the relevant scripts allowed this? All that is needed is that they
> use /etc/X11/app-defaults/Foo, if it
Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, couldn't the files in app-defaults be marked as config files
> ("DEBIAN/conffiles") in the packages?
Only if you want Ian Jackson to post a bug report against your
package---conffiles do not belong in /usr.
Please look at /usr/doc/X11/debian.R
Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Backups would be much easier if _all_ the configurable files are in /etc
> and /usr can't be mounted readonly if one has to change the app-defaults
> file. (Shouldn't, as a simple rule, all files that are referred by the
> debpkg-conffiles be placed i
waste of time for the maintainer
to create packages for executables that are going to expire. Better
to let him save his energy for the next release.
Mike.
--
Michael Alan Dorman Head of Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Louis Calder Memorial Library
(305) 243
y.
Please read my post to c.o.l.a. for a little more information.
Mike.
--
Michael Alan Dorman Head of Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Louis Calder Memorial Library
(305) 243-5530 University of Miami School of Medicine
Shaya Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just got xanim compiled on my system with full for cinepack and indeo
> enconding, I also compiled in sound, but I have no idea if it works since
> I don't have a sound card on my linux box. If anyone want it, I will try
> to put it together as a pa
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joe Reinhardt writes:
>I am having trouble with dpkg-ftp 1.4.0. I repeatedly get this error
>when trying to install:
You should upgrade to 1.4.1, though, if what you have is truly 1.4.0
They shouldn't affect anything. Unless they're adversely affecting your
insta
22 matches
Mail list logo
