On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 14:28 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 10/14/2010 01:52 PM, Martin Spinassi wrote:
> > Hi list!
> >
> > I'm searching for some good CPU synthetic test. I've found a few, but
> > their last update where from ~1996, and don't know if t
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 02:25 +, T o n g wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:32:51 +0200, godo wrote:
>
> >> PS: I'll be a while with this, but once it's done, if someone is
> >> interested in getting the results, just let me know.
> >>
> > I'm interested! :-)
>
> Me 2.
I'll got them for the next
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 10:52 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I'm searching for some good CPU synthetic test. I've found a few, but
> > their last update where from ~1996, and don't know if they are the right
> > tools to test modern CPU chips.
>
> > Any suggestions?
>
> Hard to tell without more
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 20:28 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > The only problem with old code is that it might not compile with modern
> > GCC.
>
> This is minor. The bigger problem with benchmark code from the mid 90s
> is that all the floating point code targets the 80 bit x87 FPU and IEEE
> 754
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 14:28 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 10/14/2010 01:52 PM, Martin Spinassi wrote:
> > Hi list!
> >
> > I'm searching for some good CPU synthetic test. I've found a few, but
> > their last update where from ~1996, and don't know if t
Hi list!
I'm searching for some good CPU synthetic test. I've found a few, but
their last update where from ~1996, and don't know if they are the right
tools to test modern CPU chips.
Any suggestions?
Thanks!
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
6 matches
Mail list logo
