Re: Re: git-buildpackage

2013-05-17 Thread Loyall, David
Andrei wrote: > Then you would be in the best position to > improve the documentation. I do appreciate your enthusiasm for encouraging folks to contribute, but this statement is clearly factually wrong. :) I would accept "In the future, you might find yourself in the best position to improve th

Re: Re: git-buildpackage

2013-05-17 Thread Loyall, David
> What is the output of "git tag -l" in your repository? 0.1 0.2 0.3 [...many lines...] 3.20121212 3.20130212 3.20130504 etch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debi

git-buildpackage

2013-05-15 Thread Loyall, David
Hello. Originally I authored this message for the developer of git-buildpackage, but then I realized that I have no idea how many such inquiries he might receive, so I'd better not send one more. I am a huge fan of git, and debian, so I really like the idea of git-buildpackage. I've even used