Re: Does XFS work with LVM?

2007-01-08 Thread Lars Roland
e2fsck is run with the filesystem unmounted ? which is not exactly what I associate with being online. On xfs you can always use the xfs_growfs command to enlarge a fs, no matter what state it is in (except corrupted). -- Lars Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

Re: Dependency Injection

2006-09-22 Thread Lars Roland
block package upgrades by specifying its maintainer or something similar in /etc/apt/preferences or must I use the Pin-Priority trick along with the full package version: Package: mysql-client Pin: version 4.0.23-1 Pin-Priority: 1001 -- Lars Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

Dependency Injection

2006-09-22 Thread Lars Roland
this package ? Regards Lars Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Size difference between file systems

2006-09-02 Thread Lars Roland
small (emails) so tail packing might be the reason and given I have not mounted it with notail it should be on. -- Lars Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Size difference between file systems

2006-09-02 Thread Lars Roland
Hi I have been moving some data from a Reiserfs partition to a XFS volume on LVM, during this process I discovered that 8.9GB of data on the reiser partition turns into 12Gb of data on the XFS volume (I got those numbers using "df -h"). The XFS volume was created during the Debian Etch installati

Re: Intel Xeon

2006-03-16 Thread Lars Roland
works perfectly, this also brings you kernel 2.6.15 along with udev so no need for spiffy tricks in order to compile kernels never than 2.6.12 - etch (testing) seams to be very stable and performs great (at least when running apps such as Apache, php, mysql...). -- Lars Roland

Stability of software RAID

2005-11-17 Thread Lars Roland
still achieve greater throughput than just chaining the 4 disks together using LVM (as in without the software stripe). Regards. Lars Roland

Re: Debian Volatile?

2005-11-12 Thread Lars Roland
ssin (3.1 that is) it should be ready to go into volatile (see this post which also contains url to the actual debian package http://lists.debian.org/debian-volatile/2005/10/msg3.html) - I have been using these debs for some time on our smtp servers and it works great. -- Lars Roland

Re: how do I reinstall Mozilla?

2005-11-06 Thread Lars Roland
ml), then delete ~/.mozilla and fire up mozilla again. Regards. Lars Roland

Re: Solaris: The Most Advanced OS?

2005-11-04 Thread Lars Roland
ies to do the same stuff in Debian - that is why I have 30+ Linux servers running Debian Sarge and I have no plans to change OS on them Regards. Lars Roland

Re: cant copy file

2005-08-17 Thread Lars Roland
cp: omitting directory `/root/.openoffice/' > > Any ideas on this? if you do a "man cp" you will find: "By default, `cp' does not copy directories (see -r below)." so try adding a "-r" (or -a) -- Lars Roland

Re: Renice cron

2005-07-01 Thread Lars Roland
ask from with in itself (i.e by getting the pidof itself and then renice it) but setting a level in crontab would be much nicer. See this post for an old (inconclusive) discussion about niced cron jobs: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/1999/06/msg01697.html Regards. Lars Roland

Re: Renice cron

2005-07-01 Thread Lars Roland
On 7/1/05, Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 02:35:52PM +0200, Lars Roland wrote: > > Hi all > > > > Is it possible to renice a single cronjob from within crontab ?. > > Have you tried? Of cause I have - stop posting unles

Renice cron

2005-06-29 Thread Lars Roland
Hi all Is it possible to renice a single cronjob from within crontab ?. Regards. Lars Roland

Re: iptables init.d script: where is it?

2005-06-15 Thread Lars Roland
ur current rules. Regards. Lars Roland

Re: Sarge Performance

2005-05-22 Thread Lars Roland
On 5/21/05, Lars Roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all > > I just replaced my company anti-virus/anti-spam mail gateway from a > Redhat 7.3 with kernel 2.4.24 to Debian Sarge with kernel 2.6.8.1. I > had hoped that this transition would lead to better performance (new &

Re: Sarge Performance

2005-05-21 Thread Lars Roland
On 5/21/05, Jochen Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Lars Roland: > > > > I just replaced my company anti-virus/anti-spam mail gateway from a > > Redhat 7.3 with kernel 2.4.24 to Debian Sarge with kernel 2.6.8.1. I > > had hoped that this transition woul

Re: Sarge Performance

2005-05-21 Thread Lars Roland
re more accustomed to dealing with extremely > high-volume mail servers. At least, you are more likely to > find someone there than here. Thanks I did not think of that one - seams more likely that people with my type of load will be there. Regards. Lars Roland

Sarge Performance

2005-05-21 Thread Lars Roland
t has. When I do a telnet to port 25 I simply do not get a connection fast enough (most of them times out) so this leads my to suspect that something is wrong. Regards. Lars Roland

Re: sarge freeze, server colocation

2005-05-04 Thread Lars Roland
On 5/4/05, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am about to colocate a debian server and now I don't know if I > should install woody or sarge. > I'll be colocating it in 1-3 weeks. I am thinking that I should > probably use sarge. > Any advice? > thanks William Well i would defenetly go sarge,

Re: IBM eserver X336

2005-05-04 Thread Lars Roland
l-image-2.6-"put your image here" to get kernel 2.6 (this is because the 2.6 kernel on the netinst cd does not support the cdrom device in th 336 only the 2.4 kernel will allow you to boot). Regards. Lars Roland

Re: Silence apt-get for real

2005-05-03 Thread Lars Roland
exsisted, it solved my problem. Thanks for the reply Regards. Lars Roland

Silence apt-get for real

2005-05-02 Thread Lars Roland
nt apt-get to be completely silent. I know that this could be dangerous - but in my case it is ok given that it is me that control the repository and that I have tested all the packages before putting them there. So to put it short how do I silence apt-get completely ?. Regards. Lars Roland