On Fri, 8/Nov/02 20:01:35, nate wrote:
> check the process table to see if shells for those ttys are still
> open.
>
> e.g.
>
> [aphro@portal:~]$ w
> 20:00:16 up 9 days, 1:31, 2 users, load average: 1.38, 0.69, 0.60
> USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT
> ap
Hi all,
Is there a tool which allows to look what a process has tried to do?
Regards,
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
If I may ask for your comments.
I have to set on my webserver pages written by someone. One of file which
must be put in cgi-bin directory is following script (only this two lines).
#!/usr/bin/env bash
./foo bar.html
The whole construction looks dangerous for me. I'm thinking about hard
Hi Petr,
On Fri, 14/Dec/01 11:36:43, Petr Danek wrote:
> Hi ,
> i think you should do this
>
> apt-get update
> apt-get install iptables
Doesn't work. I use potato :).
>
>
> bye Petr
[snip]
Regards,
Chris
Hi,
On Thu, 13/Dec/01 17:57:22, Bender, Jeff wrote:
>
> I just recently upgraded my kernel to Linux 2.4.14 with the IPTables
> compilied into the kernel. Supposedly it comes integrated into the kernel.
> I looked everywhere for the iptables binary and couldn't find it. I did a
> 'find / -name i
Hi Mark,
On Wed, 5/Dec/01 20:29:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 11:57:57AM -0800, Empty One wrote:
> > I realise this may be a little late, it being the
> > fourth and all, but i'm a behing in reading the list.
> > Are you sure you aren't leaving the origional message
> >
Hi there
Goeffrey, if you have 256MB check
http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/kt20010528_120.html#2
if it is your problem
Regards,
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Geoffrey Romer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: Swap fsck
Hi there
It should be kettle of cause. There were more fun, I hope :).
Regards,
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Glyn Millington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Krzysztof Mazurczyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 8:41 PM
Subject: Re
s one.
Regards
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Gaddis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Krzysztof Mazurczyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 4:57 PM
Subject: RE: Problem with fetchmail (was: I can't start with mutt)
> Is the
k but fetchmail does something strange.
Regards
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "D-Man" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with fetchmail (was: I can't start with mutt)
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:50:41PM +0200, Krzyszto
Any comments ?
Regards
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Krzysztof Mazurczyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 8:54 PM
Subject: I can't start with mutt
> Hi there,
>
> Long time I have used M$ OE (till now) but now i'm switching to m
Hi there,
Long time I have used M$ OE (till now) but now i'm switching to mutt.
But mutt displays after start: /var/spool/mail/myuser is not a mailbox
and displays no posts.
My mailbox was written by procmail after fetching mail from server.
All permissions to dirs and mailbox seems to be set corr
Hi John,
Your post contains longest line I've seen in any mail. Remember to wrap
your lines to 72 chars about. It'll be readable better.
It would be better if you enclose fragment of your log.
Check if you don't block transmission on lo interface,
check if your host protects itself i.e. if you bl
- Original Message -
From: "Wayne Topa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: iptables and 2.4.4 kernel in testing
>
> I also compiled 'all' of the modules into the kernel, at first. I
> found one problem with that method tho. When conntrack was com
Hi there,
I don't know the reason of this message but I've had the same if I
mistakenly MASQ'ed
doubly, i. e. packet went throu by two rules with -j MASQ (one from FORWARD
and one from OUTPUT chain).
Regards for all
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Gabor Gludovatz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
Hi there,
I use potato r3 with 2.4 kernel
Version of libc6 was 2.2-6 (taken from woody some time ago)
and libdb2 was 2:2.4.14-2.7.7.1.c (from potato r3).
Everything was working well. Now I upgraded libc6 to 2.2.3-1 and (because
of dependences) libdb2 to 2.7.7-7. After that syslogd don't start and
Unmounting is also impossible if your current directory is somewhere
in mounted file system.
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Angel Parra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 11:54 PM
Subject: Umount problem!!
> I think that it can be a sily question .. but I can't rem
- Original Message -
From: "William Leese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 1:35 AM
Subject: Re: I forgot my root Password
> On Friday 04 May 2001 01:31, William Leese wrote:
> > > Please I need your help, I know I`m a fuckin silly user, but I
forgot
> > > my root pa
Hi there,
Remark: CaT, your translation is very well !
I had fight with the same problem. The solution (workaround ?) is
to comment out following lines in /etc/apache/srm.conf
AddDefaultCharset on
AddDefaultCarsetName iso-8859-1
I suppose that problem may exists in other national charsets out of
Hi there,
How is it possible ?
I have a mail server based on potato r2. Everything works well.
When I boot system with 2.4.0 kernel works well *nearly* everything.
Ipop daemon workin well if a user is connecting by LAN. When the same user
connects
by modem to his internet provider and then to my
Hi there,
On my Linux server I quoted one partition. After that some time later I've
got this message on the console
VFS: No free dquotas ...
I have to reboot (there were no enter to system). After a quarter there were
the same situation.
In debug.log I found
kernel: get_empty_dquot: pruning d
bian-user@lists.debian.org
CC: Krzysztof Mazurczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 6 Dec 2000 18:55
Re: bind & sendmail both as non-root
>
>Hello,
>
>I don't know what you did to your email font/bg, but I ended up with a VERY
>black screen with BLACK words! :| Once I cli
Hi there,I use potato r0. On my system bind (8.2.2) and sendmail
(8.9.3-23) arerunning together.Bind run as non-root daemon, sendmail is
running by inetd. When sendmail isrun as root is OK. When I chown sendmail
to mail:mail and tell inetd to runas mail then sendmail writes to
log ... re
23 matches
Mail list logo