Problems with apt-get source

Hi, Here is what I get when using apt-get source : ebiz:/etc/apt# man apt-get Reformatting apt-get(8), please wait... ebiz:/etc/apt# apt-get source krb5-telnetd --download-only Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done E: Could not open file /var/lib/apt/lists/http.u

krb5-telnetd

Hi, Is it possible to set things up with this version of telnetd so that non-Kerberos logins are not permitted as a fallback? Thanks, Kenneth -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Trying to use Kerberos

Hi, I am working with IBM DCE v3.1 as the KDC which is supposedly wire compatible with MIT Kerberos. When I try to use kinit (from krb5-user in Woody) to get credentials, I get the following error message : kinit(v5): KDC policy rejects request while getting initial credentials.

Re: procmail locking problem

On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Bob Proulx wrote: > > > > message should be for /var/mail/y2kmvs.lock and not /var/spool/mail. > > I like to peek into the binary to make sure of what I am getting. > Therefore I ran 'strings' on /usr/bin/procmail and see this. > > strings /usr/bin/procmail |grep /var >

Re: procmail locking problem

On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bob Proulx wrote: > Are you sure you are using procmail from woody? If so then that error Reasonably. I had been running Potato but did a dist-upgrade. > message should be for /var/mail/y2kmvs.lock and not /var/spool/mail. > /var/spool/mail should be a symlink to

procmail locking problem

Hi, I am using Postfix on Woody as the MTA and procmail as the MDA. In my procmail log file, I see messages such as : procmail: Lock failure on "/var/spool/mail/y2kmvs.lock" The ownership of /var/spool/mail is root.mail and the permissions are rwxrwsr-x . If this is a permission

Have I been hacked?

Hi, Looking at the system logs for my Potato system (it was Slink, but I apt-get upgraded), I see some unusual entries. From messages.0 : Dec 31 05:29:18 marvin 173>Dec 31 05:29:18 /sbin/rpc.statd[300]: gethostbyname error for ^X÷ÿ¿^X÷ÿ¿^Y÷ÿ¿^Y÷ÿ¿^Z÷ÿ¿^Z÷ÿ¿^[÷ÿ¿^[÷ÿ¿b6ec 804a174400f00786

Re: Mailing list headers [Was Re: ssh vs telnet - which is faster?]

On Fri, 10 Dec 1999, Steve Lamb wrote: > Friday, December 10, 1999, 2:53:54 AM, Kenneth wrote: > > I think that this is a bad suggestion since there are some people (such as > > me) who use the Reply-To headers to ensure that the recipients have a valid > > reply address to reply to us. If the mai

Mailing list headers [Was Re: ssh vs telnet - which is faster?]

On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Steve Lamb wrote: > Friday, December 10, 1999, 4:04:47 AM, RAVIKANT wrote: > > * DO NOT BOTHER CC-ING THE MAIL REPLY , BECAUSE I AM ALREADY SUBSCRIBED TO > > ALL THE LISTS - ILUGC , LINUX-INDIA , LINUX-NEWBIE , DEBIAN-USER * > > Might I suggest having them set reply-tos l