On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:35:41PM +0100, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 December 2007 09:54, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:27:22AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > > Many people seem to think that ftp.debian.org is the canonical location
> >
l normal mirrors that carry debian/ also have project/experimental.
--
Josip Rodin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
itch to a better place. All mirrors with reasonably
responsive maintainers will not be affected; those who have ignored our
advice might notice changes.)
--
Josip Rodin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
]
--
Josip Rodin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 04:43:18AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:00:55 -0500 (CDT),
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > In effort to control spam email we have implemented an email
> > verification system.
>
> ..url to credentials? This _is_
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 07:17:47AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> This means e.g. gmane.org users will get a copy of each message, even
> though they've already read them.
No, it doesn't. Try thinking about what it means when the web page says
"This list is not moderated, posting is allowed to anyon
Hi,
Please don't file bugs about .debian.org DNS records missing on
www.debian.org, that is not a suitable pseudo-package for this kind
of an issue and there's none other appropriate.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 07:42:07AM -0700, A R wrote:
> Hi guys, can someone tell me what script we use in our
> mail list archive? We need to develop a message board
> similar to the one we got in the archives. It is the
> best looking one (no bias here!)
It's a combination of procmail, mhonarc a
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 11:29:50PM +0200, Manuel Samper wrote:
> > > Debian has provides a security patch for Potato but not for
> > > Woody/Sid. See http://www.debian.org/security/2002/dsa-131
> >
> > Debian does not provide security updates for testing or for unstable.
>
> Need to get 2188kB/1
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 01:37:10AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Why is it prompting for these when I have not modified them at all
> > AFAIK? Is this a bug in dpkg or a packaging error? Anyone know?
>
> You'll have to compare MD5 checksums to figure that out. Without those
> we really can'
- Forwarded message from Varady Geza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 May 2002 17:05:52 +0200
From: Varady Geza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: debian hpt370 raid
Hi There,
I have a question, hopefully short enough worth answering :),
than
- Forwarded message from Guy Nils <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 May 2002 02:29:11 +0200
From: "Guy Nils" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: new in debian need help
please if you can tell my
1)can i install "debian sendmail"on a SPARCstation
2)and if i ca
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 11:20:08AM +0700, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote:
> > When you install from scratch you lose the configuration file changes on the
> > old installation.
>
> It is not a problem, since most of the configs are default anyway.
Maybe for you...
> > Set the debconf level to cri
- Forwarded message from Chris Beswick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivery-date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 00:43:16 +0200
From: "Chris Beswick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: iBook 600MHz
Hi,
I have been unable to get woody (the latest netinst cd) to find my hd during
install (i
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:00:32PM +0700, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote:
> I believe that most packages will be upgraded when stable is changed from
> potato to woody. I guess that that process will be relatively slower since
> it has to delete/ replace the old packages first before installing the
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 20 19:25:04 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 19:25:03 +0100
Received: from master.debian.org ([216.234.231.5])
by cibalia.gkvk.hr with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16nkli-0003ei-
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 20 07:37:13 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 07:37:05 +0100
Received: from master.debian.org ([216.234.231.5])
by cibalia.gkvk.hr with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16nZib-Nz-
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 06:23:53PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > is there any online resource that documents the (current) status of the
> > woody freeze process?
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2002/debian-devel-announce-200202/
> (see all the "release status updates"?)
>
> > i
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 15 14:24:13 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:24:10 +0100
Received: from master.debian.org ([216.234.231.5] ident=mail)
by cibalia.gkvk.hr with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16b
Hi,
I so sincerely hope someone can help these nice, friendly people >:)
- Forwarded message from Enduser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivery-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 05:11:00 +0100
From: Enduser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bulk Mail Friendly Hosting Needed
X-Spam-Status:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 01:38:21PM +, Rob Bradford wrote:
> The Debian FAQoamtic seems to have disappeared, maybe a simpler FAQ
> system should be developed from which we can export in variety of
> formats to go to build up the debian-faq documentation.
I really don't think the format is cruci
Hi guys,
If anyone has some time to go through Debian Planet, Debian Help and other
similar sites and make a list of frequently asked questions, preferably with
answers, please do, and send me the results. :)
I think it's (way past) time to extend the Debian FAQ with some of that
stuff, like Pent
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 01:29:56AM -0800, tluxt wrote:
> > Also document installed by "apt-howto" are useful.
> >
> > Oh, my web page below also has some hints. Cheers :)
> > + My debian quick-reference, http://qref.sourceforge.net/quick/ +
>
> I found your quick reference very informative
Hi,
The new xmms package that just got installed in unstable doesn't have the
locale stuff. Yes, I have noticed. Yes, I have persisted in uploading it
that way because it is not fatal and the new release fixes other, more fatal
bugs.
If you know an xmms user which might go berserk seeing this, pl
- Forwarded message from Bhavin Desai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivery-date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 12:06:04 +0100
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Originating-IP: [202.70.194.29]
From: "Bhavin Desai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bcc:
Subject: Need E-Mail Distribution Server
Da
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 04:33:08PM -0500, rj fleck wrote:
> Package: xmms
> Version: 1.2.5-2
> Severity: important
>
> seems to have only started happening on newer versions of the x-libraries
>
> ii xlibs 4.1.0-7X Window System client libraries
I've got xlibs 4.1.0-
Hi,
Here's some interesting trivia: the debian-announce mailing list now has
more than twenty thousand subscribers. See http://lists.debian.org/stats/
for that and more statistics about our mailing lists[1].
I propose a virtual toast: here's to the twenty thousand, and let's hope
that the mailing
- Forwarded message from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
Delivery-date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:33:04 +0200
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 19:54:06 +0200
From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gdk-imlib1_1.9.11-1.i386.deb is missing
Us
- Forwarded message from Nicolò Chieffo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivery-date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 15:37:24 +0200
From: Nicolò Chieffo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: error in packages dependancies
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 17:33:17 +0200
debian:/var/cache/apt/archives# apt-get
- Forwarded message from kaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivery-date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 20:36:29 +0200
From: "kaki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 09:34:34 +0300
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 01:35:48AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> dialout:
>
> HELP: Is this used for /dev/cua devices or something?
Like, find /dev -group dialout
> dip:
>
> HELP: WHat did this group's name signify? DIaluP?
The name dip probably comes from the name of the dip program.
Hi people,
I've made some changes to http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting that the
readers of this list should know about. It now suggests asking here in case
the reader/bug submitter doesn't have a clue what package has s/he noticed a
problem in.
This seemed like a sensible thing to do, since a
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 06:19:39PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> > I've been having problems for ages with XMMS, and I just thought I'd put a
> > little flag up to see if anyone else has has similar experiences. In
> > particular, XMMS seems to have a really hard time playing nicely with
> > respect
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 12:41:30PM +0100, joy wrote:
> I guess I could close #83731 now, but I still don't know how to get
> /etc/X11/X, how does it get created?
Ah, dpkg-reconfigure xserver-s3 did it. I'll assume that had it not been for
debconf/perl errors, the upgrade process would have done it
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 03:18:48AM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > It appears there's something fscked up with debconf+X+perl upgrade
> > procedure in sid, upgrading from potato. The upgrade left me without
> > /etc/X11/X (I've already filed a bug about that) and see what I get when
> > I try to reconf
Hi people,
It appears there's something fscked up with debconf+X+perl upgrade procedure
in sid, upgrading from potato. The upgrade left me without /etc/X11/X (I've
already filed a bug about that) and see what I get when I try to reconfigure
stuff:
# dpkg-reconfigure xserver-common
Can't locate wa
Hi people,
As the subject says, I'd like to have a list with hanging indentation in a
manual page. Basically, I want to see this list in xmms(1):
* Audio MPEG layer 1, 2, and 3 (with mpg123 plug-in),
* WAV, RAW, AU (with internal wav plug-in and MikMod plug-
in),
*
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 10:28:12PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > There's a bug filed against the doc-debian package, including the Debian
> > FAQ, about not having good backup instructions for users (admins). See
> > http://bugs.debian.org/69197 for details.
> >
> > Can someone please sugg
Hi,
There's a bug filed against the doc-debian package, including the Debian
FAQ, about not having good backup instructions for users (admins). See
http://bugs.debian.org/69197 for details.
Can someone please suggest an answer to such a question so I can include it
in the FAQ? `apt-cache search b
Hi people,
I was wondering if someone can tell me what is this about:
Oct 29 21:36:30 hostname dhcpd-2.2.x: BOOTREQUEST from 00:00:79:58:97:27 via
eth0 (non-rfc1048)
Oct 29 21:36:30 hostname dhcpd-2.2.x: No applicable record for BOOTP host
00:00:79:58:97:27 via eth0
This keeps happening at fai
Note: I don't read -user, just -devel, so I just saw this thread. I
apologize for duplication, if someone already said things I'm going to say
in my message.
Kurt Seifried wrote:
> >Basically, you are forking development. There is now a version to be
> >found in all the standard places where you
[please CC: any replies to -user]
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 02:24:10PM -0400, Maitland Bottoms wrote:
> What should the permissions and ownership of /tmp/.X11-unix be to make
> the X server happy?
drwxrwxrwt2 root usersgroup 1024 Jun 24 01:44 /tmp/.X11-unix
I'm not sure if the latest X pa
On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 07:37:59PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > Apt uses a mixed approach: it uses the same textfiles as dpkg but
> > uses a binary cache to also get the advantages of a binary database.
>
> it does? where?
See /var/cache/apt/*.bin files.
An example why is that good is the spe
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 11:47:36AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> Looking at the Debian home page, one get the impression that only the
> now very old Slink distribution, with kernel 2.0.36, old X, old libc,
> etc, released March 1999 is available.
It's the official one, still.
> The News section
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 02:16:08PM +0200, Michel Verdier wrote:
> | deb packages are a lot harder to create for the novice users. There is
> | not much documentation to help in this area either.
>
> There is perhaps not much documentation but :
> # ls /usr/man/man1/dh*|wc -l
> 30
You people
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 04:54:14PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On one of my servers, I had to put this in pap-secrets to allow dialins:
>
> # Every regular user can use PPP and has to use passwords from /etc/passwd
> * silly "" *
> hamishsilly "" 203.14.18.2
> charles
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 12:04:30PM -0800, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> Guess I'm a tester.
debian-testing or debian-boot mailing lists might be more appropriate.
> Almost every went well...except lynx.
>
> .. dpkg error processing lynx
> subproc post - install script returned error exit status
reassign 25816 netbase
merge 8927 25816
thanks
As the subject says, this needs to be implemented in update-inetd,
nowhere else. So I'll reassign it to netbase and merge it with the
rest.
Peter Makholm (brother) already did some work on it, but I haven't
seen anything else... and we have a big fat
On Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 06:36:47PM +0200, Robert Vollmert wrote:
> With /bin/sh -> /bin/ash, I get the following error:
>
> guess.datestyle: 25: Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")")
>
> It works fine with bash. It seems the opening brace on
>
> case "$x" in ( SystemV | posix |
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 02:16:59PM +0200, Juli-Manel Merino Vidal wrote:
> I've noticed some problem with manual pages of xemacs (an I think that
> also with tin). When I run man, when it's updating the cache, it shows
> a lot of annoying messages on screen of the following type:
[snip]
> Why the
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 05:37:35PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I typed:
> >
> > $ cvs commit -r 1.5 maint-guide.sgml
> >
> > Edited the changelog, saved it, exited, and after some time got this
> > message:
> >
> > cvs server: Up-to-date check failed for `maint-guide.sgml'
> > c
Hi,
I typed:
$ cvs commit -r 1.5 maint-guide.sgml
Edited the changelog, saved it, exited, and after some time got this
message:
cvs server: Up-to-date check failed for `maint-guide.sgml'
cvs [server aborted]: correct above errors first!
cvs commit: saving log message in /tmp/cvs01258baa
What t
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 05:52:24AM -0700, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> How many bits of encryption does Mozilla use for secure documents? If
> I am to use Mozilla as a replacement for netscape I'd like to see the
> 128 bit version, so I can use it for on-line purchases for e-merchants
> with a credit c
On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 10:20:00AM -0700, Steven Work wrote:
> > > I guess I should put a recompiled libgtk1.2 and libglib1.2 there, too...
> > > tell me if anything else is needed.
> >
> > I am using the ones that came with the gnome slink
> > compile. All is fine untill now.
>
> But the depende
Hi people,
You can find mozilla .debs compiled for glibc2.0 (slink version) here:
http://pandora.debian.org/~joy/slink/
They worked on a mostly-slink system I tried them on.
I guess I should put a recompiled libgtk1.2 and libglib1.2 there, too...
tell me if anything else is needed.
And
Hi people,
Mark Eichin and Stephen Pitts were kind enough to do extra research
on why doesn't mozilla start on some occasions. And Stephen actually
got it all right :)
If it is run by an ordinary user, mozilla can't write files in
/usr/lib/mozilla directory, which is the $MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME direc
Hi people,
The subject says it all. They're also in http://pandora.debian.org/~joy/ .
Sorry, they'll run only on the unstable distribution (libc6 2.1)
--
enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/
On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 12:06:47PM -0400, William R Pentney wrote:
> Just downloaded the new GNOME from the slink staging area ... but when I
> try to run it, all I get is the following error:
>
> GImLib ERROR: Cannot find file : /etc/im/im_palette.pal
> gdk_imlib : Cannot find Palette. A Palette
Hi everyone,
Me and Brent Fulgham managed to get Mozilla (nescaffe 5.0 prerelease
for those who don't know) milestone four (M4) Debian package ready
for wider testing. Please, download the .debs (two are needed, mozilla
and libnspr21) from here:
http://www.debian.org/~joy/mozilla/
If the
On Fri, Mar 05, 1999 at 02:33:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Libraries that have packaged for the first time after the release of hamm
> typically do not have a libc5 compatibility version, and omit the "g".
This is the reason why I'm asking. The mentioned package is being built
for the fir
On 22.12.1998., at 14:35, Erick Branderhorst wrote:
>JR> There are two bug reports, and from what I can see,
>JR> you are/were the maintainer of mathpad. But, now I
>JR> can't find that package. Should the bugs (#2231 and
>JR> #3312) be closed now?
>
>I don't maintain the package
61 matches
Mail list logo
