Re: Problem with Mutt <-> GPG cooperation

1999-12-20 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 11:41:52PM +0100, Wojciech Zabolotny wrote: > > I had this problem too and upgraded to mutt 1.0i and it's gone away, so > > I guess it was a known bug that got fixed. > Is the mutt 1.0i available somewhere as a debian package? 1.0 appears to be in unstable according to a

Re: Problem with Mutt <-> GPG cooperation

1999-12-20 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 06:57:17PM +0100, Wojciech Zabolotny wrote: > I can't force my mutt/gpg set to work properly. Signing of messages > works fine (as can be seen from this message :-) ), but I can't > encrypt a message to be sent to somebody. I have the recipient's > public key in my public

Re: pgp confusion

1999-11-12 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 06:36:31PM +1100, Shao Zhang wrote: > Is pgp5 backward compatible with pgp2? I have an email which is > encrypted using pgp5 with my pubring generated by pgp2, but I > could not seem to open it using pgp2. > > If I upgrade to pgp5, do I need to gen

Re: "Cuenta pelas" para Internet

1999-10-29 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 11:51:20AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: > On 29 Oct 1999, Rafael Martn Candial wrote: > > Hola, hasta ahora me he conectado a Internet desde Windows, pero he > > conseguido configurar mi modem en Linux y he descubierto que todo > > funciona mejor y es mas estable (era de