On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 11:33:40PM -0700, Eric N. Valor wrote:
>
> That pretty much turns off exim altogether.
Actually the script in /etc/init.d/ will start exim in stand-alone mode
if you disable the listener in inetd.conf. So you will still have it
listening on 25/tcp.
> While effective for
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 06:32:47AM +, Jim Breton wrote:
> In /var/log/daemon.log I see the following:
>
> cardmgr[163]: + /sbin/pump -i eth0 > /dev/null
> cardmgr[163]: + pump: no extra parameters are expected
> cardmgr[163]: start cmd exited with status 1
Well... I fou
Please ignore, I was unaware of the debian-laptop list until just now;
will re-post there. Thanks.
I've got potato 2.2r2 running on a Quantex laptop.
Whenever I insert my ethernet card (Linksys PCMPC100), the drivers for
it load successfully but pump fails to configure it.
In /var/log/daemon.log I see the following:
cardmgr[163]: + /sbin/pump -i eth0 > /dev/null
cardmgr[163]: + pump: no extr
I have been aliasing startx to "startx -nolisten tcp" in my local users'
.bash_profiles in order to prevent X from listening on port 6000 on
startup.
However, display managers (at least gdm anyway) don't care about these
aliases, and furthermore I would like to make this option the
system-wide def
Is there someplace on debian.org from which I can get a file or files
containing the md5sums of all the packages? Not the packages' contents,
but the packages themselves.
I have some ISOs I got from another site (linuxiso.org) and I would like
to confirm the sums of all the packages before I use
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> I have some files that I would like to store encrypted. Of course I can
See also PPDD:
http://linux01.gwdg.de/~alatham/ppdd.html
I would if they weren't all in the same dir Plus lots of other useful
things like chmod.
OTOH, anyone who did manage to hack an account with a restricted shell
wouldn't have any business running chmod, so I suppose you could get away
with just taking /bin out of his path. But then I imagine
On Sun, 12 Dec 1999, William T Wilson wrote:
> Giving a user a chrooted home won't be an easy task. You need to have a
> fully functional system under there - that means the shell, libc, and all
> that jazz. Are you sure you can't do what you want to do with a
> restricted shell?
I primarily wa
9 matches
Mail list logo
