Oh, wow... how can you increase throughput on a modem by increasing the
services that put demands on it?
Nils Rennebarth wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 1998 at 01:20:38AM -0600, Jay D. Winks wrote:
> > O.K. So we've got 3-1/2 for IPMasq and 1-1/2 for squid
> To save bandwidth
PMan:
Well, out of the five responses I got from a post in the debian users
group, I got four mentions of IPMasq, and two mentions of a proxy called
SQUID. Nobody even mentioned SOCKS, but I have definitely heard of it
from my many run-throughs of NT configuration. Which way do y'all have
it set u
O.K. So we've got 3-1/2 for IPMasq and 1-1/2 for squid, or something to that
effect . I checked out the associated URL. Looks good. Thanks for
helping a new guy get into the FreeOS thing. Hey, FreeOS -- rhymes with BeOS --
hmmm ;)
Jay D. Winks
--
E-mail the word "unsubscribe&
I have researched a few different distributions and found Debian to be
the best-documented of the group, and that's important to me. My mates
and I seek only to inplement a household proxy for concurrent connection
to the 'Net at the moment, but we will doubtless want to do more in the
future. Does
4 matches
Mail list logo
