On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 10:58:11AM +, Jason A Whittle wrote:
> There have been several threads lately about ZIP drives, but none of them
> appear to address SYSFS problems. While I'm not yet knowledgable about
> SYSFS, I've been reading up, but I haven't found a solut
There have been several threads lately about ZIP drives, but none of them
appear to address SYSFS problems. While I'm not yet knowledgable about
SYSFS, I've been reading up, but I haven't found a solution yet. I was
hoping someone here would know at least where I should go to RTFM.
The problem
I would like to create a large number of small, simple flow charts. I
looked at XFig, but ideally I would like to enter all of the relationships
and then generate the diagrams for various formats. Following up on the
TeX thread, would this be an appropriate application of LaTex?
Cheers,
Jason
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:36:24AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> This is really old, but it's straight up my alley, so...
>
> on Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 07:08:39PM -0600, Christopher L. Everett ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > I do a lot of database work. Sometimes I must do massive batch jobs on
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 02:03:15AM -0500, Christopher J. Noyes wrote:
> I just installed the 2.4.16 686 kernel image and now when I boot I get these messages
>
> request_module[block-major-3]: root fs not mounted
> VFS: cannot open root device "hda8" or 3:08
> Please append a correct "root=" boot
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 03:32:52PM -0500, Christopher J. Noyes wrote:
> Does anyone know if there is support for LinkSys NE 100 TX (LNE0TX v4) network cards?
Try the 'natsemi' kernel module.
Cheers,
Jason Whittle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:08:52PM -0800, Ken Bloom wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 22:30:18 +0100, Jason A Whittle wrote:
> > Everything seems to be working fine, but my terms are all at the default
> > resolution. I know that fbset used to be used to set the framebuffer
> >
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:46:22PM +, Alexis Huxley wrote:
> > Is it possible to retroactively label debs as having been automatically
> > installed by apt? I'd like to be able to install package dependencies
>
> What are you using to install debs that *isn't* keeping track of
> dependencie
I've been avoiding using framebuffer for the terminals since fb support
was mainstreamed into the i386 kernel, and simply setting the term
resolution in lilo.conf. It seems that framebuffers are the way of the
future, and may even be The Right Thing, so when I recently installed
sarge on new ha
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 11:51:11PM -0600, Joe Hendrix wrote:
> Jason A Whittle wrote:
> > Is it possible to retroactively label debs as having been automatically
> > installed by apt? I'd like to be able to install package dependencies
> > one at a time, but still use
Is it possible to retroactively label debs as having been automatically
installed by apt? I'd like to be able to install package dependencies
one at a time, but still use aptitude to keep track of the dependecies
for me. I haven't been able to find anything in the apt documentation,
but I may s
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 07:29:20PM +0100, Hervé Piedvache wrote:
> Here we need both speed and lots of disk space ... Dell told us, that we could
> use a fiber solution made by Emc constructor and sold by Dell. OK, why not ?!
Just a suggestion, but you might try working directly with EMC, as they
I'm sorry that my first post to debian-user is so off-topic, and that I
don't have a key yet. I hope to rectify the latter ASAP.
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 01:34:11PM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> In theory, we have a multi-party system. In practice, voting for a
> "third-party" candidate is a
13 matches
Mail list logo
