It's very hard to tell people NOT to use a CODEC that's absolutely beautiful to
behold. It looks better then MPEG (which is non-free anyway) and is a bootload
smaller, better then AVI by a longshot, better then basically anything. And as
far as any author cares, it's free (beer). Because MacO
Quick answer: No.
Longer answer: Many people have asked Apple to release binaires of their new
Sorenson Codecs (The codecs used in QT3/4). Apple has steadfastly refused. So
bug Apple some more.
And I asnwered it without a long Apple rant.. I must be getting better.
On Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at
That happened to me. I symlinked them instead :-D
Seems harmless enough, but those are famous last words. Nothing has died on me
(yet)
On Fri, Nov 05, 1999 at 11:08:10AM -0500, Aaron Solochek wrote:
> Ok, as regular readers probably know, I was having problems with
> dselect. It was complaing
OK, I'll bite.
I mean, didn't the Trolls spout this back during E 0.14? Admittedly, I gave up
on E recently for Sawmill, but E was always a good window manager. If it
wasn't, why would it be as popular as it is? You said it yourself, you don't
have to use it. Then don't.
There's nothing fo
4 matches
Mail list logo
