Help! Something happened to my /var/lib/dpkg/status file, and now
everytime I try to do anything with apt-get or dselect I get parsing
errors, and it just quits. Is there any way to correct this?
TIA,
jdk
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 04:57:06PM -0600, ktb wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:41:57PM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:47:00PM -0700, JD Kitch wrote:
> > > iface eth1 inet static
> > > address 192.168.1.1
> > > netmask 255.2
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 04:30:54PM -0600, ktb wrote:
> >
> > # The loopback interface
> > iface lo inet loopback
> >
> > # The ethernet interface, configured by etherconf
> > iface eth0 inet static
> > address 24.14.246.95
> > netmask 255.255.255.128
> > gateway 24.14.246.1
> >
> > i
Trying again No response on first attempt, which is odd for
this list, so I'm sending again. Any help is HUGELY appreciated.
- Forwarded message from JD Kitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
After considerable mucking around and a great deal of help from this
group some time
After considerable mucking around and a great deal of help from this
group some time back, I had connected a second PC to my Linux box
using a second NIC and a crossover cable. And really all I did at
that time is add the second entry to my /etc/network/interfaces, and
setup the attached PC with a
I have 2 nics in my Linux box. One connected to my cable modem, and
the other has a windows machine attached to it, which I do
masquerading for. I need to be able to connection via VPN from the
windows box to an outside host. Is there a way to easily determine
what ports needs to be opened to ac
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 08:32:48PM -0600, Richard Cobbe wrote:
> Uh oh. And you're still getting these log messages? That's probably not
> good. It's possible that lsof could slip through the cracks, so to speak,
> but it's pretty unlikely.
>
> > Just yesterday I got another machine connected t
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 04:18:30PM -0600, Richard Cobbe wrote:
> JD Kitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Security Violations
> > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> > Dec 31 11:06:47 tower kernel: Packet log: output REJECT eth0 PROTO=17
> > xx.xx.xxx.xx:61662 172.16.72.113:1
Can anyone tell me what this person is looking for here, and how I
can find out where this is coming from?
Security Violations
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dec 31 11:06:47 tower kernel: Packet log: output REJECT eth0 PROTO=17
xx.xx.xxx.xx:61662 172.16.72.113:161 L=106 S=0x00 I=7632 F=0x T=127 (#43)
De
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 06:24:26PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> right. here's my setup:
> mac 192.168.1.100
> mac2 192.168.1.101
> mac3 192.168.1.102
> win 192.168.1.200
> all pointing to '192.168.1.1' (as above) for their gateway
> (aka default
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 12:01:25AM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 10:35:33PM -0700, JD Kitch wrote:
> > Is that the only file that needs to be changed? How do I determine
> > the IP, netmask, and gateway for eth1, and then for the internal
> > mac
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 06:39:46PM -0800, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 07:22:23PM -0700, JD Kitch wrote:
> > I've been running Debian Potato\Progeny for some time now, with a
> > single nic attached to cable modem. I'm also running an ipchains
> > f
I've been running Debian Potato\Progeny for some time now, with a
single nic attached to cable modem. I'm also running an ipchains
firewall. I have added a second nic, which I would like to connect
the wife's windows machine to, and have my debian box do ip masq'ing
for the windows box.
I do alr
I running a Debain Potato system, and only serving mail for a
handfull of users. I see a few different POP server packages
available, and was wondering which one is most recomended/easiest to
configure/most secure...etc, etc...
Thanks in advance,
jdk
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 09:41:22PM -0600, Cheng H. Lee wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 08:22:46PM -0700, JD Kitch wrote:
>
> > X: user not authorized to run the X server, aborting.
>
>
> For the recent XFree86 4.0.x package, check in /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config
> Set &qu
I'm currently running a Potato install that I've "upgraded" to the
Progeny beta. I ran an update earlier today and frankly I didn't
pay much attention to what all packages updated, but something must
have changed related to X, because now I am unable to run X as any
user but root as seen below:
X
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 09:06:12AM -0800, Larry Clay wrote:
> This is a very strange problem. Before lilo runs my keyboard works just
> fine. I can get into BIOS by pressing the del key. After linux (or windoz)
> boots the keyboard works just fine. I have delay=100 to give me plenty of
> time to ty
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 01:35:09PM -0600, Amit Patil wrote:
>
> Hi ..
>
> i am trying to install an rpm package.
> but i get the following error.
> "
> failed to open /var/lib/rpm/packages.rpm: No such file or directory
> error: cannot open /var/lib/rpm/packages.rpm
>
Does the default install support an SB AWE32 for sound without
recompiling the kernel? And if so, what do I need to do to get it
working? I've not had any luck getting it to make any noise. :P
Secondly, can anyone point me to a place I could get the most recent
version of PostgreSQL complied for
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 08:01:01AM +0100, Moritz Schulte wrote:
>
> I guess, you haven't set the `prompt' option in lilo.conf.
>
Your right. I had only set delay, and forgot prompt.
Thank you,
jdk
20 matches
Mail list logo
