Re: mod_auth_pam

2001-02-01 Thread Ingo Luetkebohle
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 11:44:05AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > Just consider the case on hand: Any > > daemon has to be root to be able to use it. > No, just member of the 'shadow' group. Ah, sorry, yes. I originally proposed that as a solution for the mod_auth_pam problem and since got

Re: mod_auth_pam

2001-02-01 Thread Ingo Luetkebohle
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 02:02:02PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > That's the most ignorant statement I have seen in awhile. So you suggest > that a desktop box with one account have Kerberos or LDAP for users? Come on. We have been talking about networked machines offering services to the outside, ri

Re: mod_auth_pam

2001-01-31 Thread Ingo Luetkebohle
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 01:41:09PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > Not sure about your error message, but pam_unix.so cannot be used under > mod_auth_pam. Uh, it cannot be used to authenticate from /etc/shadow -- authenticating from /etc/passwd works fine! > So you see, it cannot authenticate for say

Re: mod_auth_pam

2001-01-31 Thread Ingo Luetkebohle
ussion with Andrew Morgan two years ago and he shares your opinion so we're probably not going to see a change in PAM. Regards, -- Ingo Luetkebohle / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 95428014 / | Student of Computational Linguistics & Computer Science; | Fargonauten.DE sysadmin; Gimp Registr