> I wonder if it'll behave any differently if you use aptitude instead of
> apt-get.
I've never used aptitude before, so after your suggestion I gave it a
try and aptitude does behave differently.
What it does is it complains of the same problem as apt, then it
offers to fix it and in every examp
>> Another way to look at this would be to ask...
>>
>> Given two available versions of a package where the higher version has
>> the lower priority, how do I get apt to automatically install the
>> lower priority one when the higher version is required to meet a
>> dependency?
>
> If the higher ve
Another way to look at this would be to ask...
Given two available versions of a package where the higher version has
the lower priority, how do I get apt to automatically install the
lower priority one when the higher version is required to meet a
dependency?
G
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
> Are you sure that this applies to *all* lucid sections, including
> lucid-updates and lucid-security? I recall reading some blogs that
> indicated that Ubuntu's pinning and default release settings don't
> work exactly like Debian's.
I checked it with apt-cache policy and everything karmic is 5
I wasn't sure what venue was best to ask this in, so if this is the
wrong place please direct me to the correct place.
I'm using APT pinning to pull packages from both Ubuntu Karmic(stable)
and Ubuntu Lucid(testing) but I'm having problems getting APT to
produce the behavior I want.
What I want i
5 matches
Mail list logo
