Rick Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> They work wonderfully. I have a k6-166 running at 210/83
> quite happilly. However, it needs some cooling at this
> speed; until i get something more than this cheesy $2 fan,
> I need to keep the side off to compile (but not at
> 166/66).
How is the
Re: UPSs
> APC seems to have the name brand recognition, but they are not
> Linux-friendly (though there has been a lot of reverse-engineering).
> BEST and TrippLite get nice marks, but not too common in stores. They
> are mentioned in HOWTO I read, but only very briefly.
>
> Opti-UPS gets grea
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(regarding hardware problems indicated by failed kernel compiles):
> You can also change the bios setings, adding more wait states or so.
This is a good idea. I forgot to mention that I already
did that.
-- Frank
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS M
Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (ragarding hardware problems
indicated by failed kernel compiles):
> because you are using K6, make sure that it is made after week 30. K6
> before week 30 will trigger a bug where people cannot compile Linux
> kernel if there are more than 32MB in their comput
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thalia L. Hooker) wrote
> Anyways, my next step was to 'make zImage'. I kept getting Sig 11 errors
> though not at the same point of compilation:
> gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
...
> After reading the FAQ, it seemed that my problems were typical
> Simon Karpen wrote:
> Looking around, I notice I have a lot of WD drives:
>
> 4GB, 4 months old
> 1.6GB, 1 year old *
> 1.6GB, 2.5 years old
> 800MB, approx 4 years old (got second hand)
> 200MB, 5 years old
>
> * This drive isn't on 24/7. All the rest are, and most have been for their
> entir
Thanks (to Thomas and Greg) for the suggestions to use
screen. I'll look into it.
I wrote:
> Is there a way to tell the process to keep running even if
> its terminal is disconnected, and then later re-attach a
> terminal to it, [...]
-- Frank
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THI
I'm thinking about a setup like this: our application would
run on a Linux box at the central office, one instance (process)
for each user. Some users would be connected over the central
office's ethernet. Other users would be at remote offices
connected perhaps directly over a modem to the centr
> I've installed 1.3.1 on a machine at work. It's on a (physical) network
> with a bunch of Windows boxes running NT, Win95 and WFW3.x. I've added
...
> Samba from bo is installed (with no problems) on the Linux box.
>
> What I'm looking for is the absolute minimum /etc/smb.conf that will
> allow
9 matches
Mail list logo
