Re: How to "rsh" but keep original user's environment?

That is awfully insecureouch. - Original Message - From: "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Debian GNU/Linux User Mailing List" Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 6:54 PM Subject: How to "rsh" but keep original user's environment? > Hi there, > > by no means am I a shell guru,

Re: how to close ports

For the extra paranoids, put # to all processes in inetd.conf and restart the daemon stop portmap from running at startup install ssh there are a lot more, do that first ;) - Original Message - From: "Umum Wijoyo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2000 16:30 Subject: how t

Re: network monitoring

over here we also used tools like Big Brother. - Original Message - From: "brian moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Debian user mailinglist" Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2000 02:52 Subject: Re: network monitoring > On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 11:41:20AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > anyone k

Re: sources.list line to support retrieval of apache source

what problems you encountered? which versions you try to compile mod_perl? - Original Message - From: "Dominic Blythe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Eugene Teo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Paul McHale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Debian-User" Se

Re: sources.list line to support retrieval of apache source

IMHO, apache should be compiled by hand. from there, you can control the dynamic modules and all that. much more flexibility. > i don't think there is a better way if there's no .deb. > it may not make you feel better, but my self-compiled > apache has been running ok for 36 hours now... > > of c

Re: startup/connection trubble [was Modules & name resolution]

access. (this is true of unless you know how to configure it properly, running NFS is a crazy choice ;) Even when it is configured properly, nah, it's a very very bad idea ;) -- Eugene Teo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://linux.com.sg

.deb for the latest version of lilo? any ideas?

the subject says it all.

Re: hacked?

> way cool. > > so if telnet is relatively secure, how about ftp? which server telnet is secure?!? hhee, i would rather stick to SSH and SCP ;) > do y'all'uns recommend for best security? > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null > >

Re: more real runlevels?

I agree, besides that, if you regretted changing it from S -> K, you can undo the sequence ;) Eugene ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Original Message - From: "Brad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 11:52 Subject: Re: more real runlevels?