On 2014-05-15 22:02, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 16/05/14 05:53, Eelis wrote:
On 2014-05-15 21:49, Scott Ferguson wrote:
From the page you started this scare campaign with:-
"Mozilla will distribute the sandbox alongside Firefox, and we are
working on deterministic builds[*1] that will
On 2014-05-15 21:54, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 16/05/14 05:41, Eelis wrote:
On 2014-05-15 21:36, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 16/05/14 05:20, Eelis wrote:
Because there are no restrictions.
No restrictions?
That's correct. It's a sandbox. The sandbox restricts the close
plugin. *You
On 2014-05-15 21:49, Scott Ferguson wrote:
From the page you started this scare campaign with:-
"Mozilla will distribute the sandbox alongside Firefox, and we are
working on deterministic builds[*1] that will allow developers to use a
sandbox compiled on their own machine with the CDM as an alte
On 2014-05-15 21:36, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 16/05/14 05:20, Eelis wrote:
Because there are no restrictions.
No restrictions?
That's correct. It's a sandbox. The sandbox restricts the close
plugin. *You* are only restricted in how you can *playback* media
encrypted by the plugin
On 2014-05-15 20:35, Eelis wrote:
On 2014-05-15 20:27, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Mozilla will be shipping an Open Source sandbox for the plugin.
Ah yes, that's also an interesting point, because one of the blog posts
says:
“Adobe and the content industry can audit our sandbox (as it is
On 2014-05-15 20:48, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 16/05/14 04:35, Eelis wrote:
On 2014-05-15 20:27, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Mozilla will be shipping an Open Source sandbox for the plugin.
Ah yes, that's also an interesting point, because one of the blog posts
says:
“Adobe and the co
On 2014-05-15 20:27, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Mozilla will be shipping an Open Source sandbox for the plugin.
Ah yes, that's also an interesting point, because one of the blog posts
says:
“Adobe and the content industry can audit our sandbox (as it is open
source) to assure themselves that w
Ah, thanks for the clarification! But now I'm confused; in what sense is
it open source software if during runtime it starts downloading and
running binary blobs from Adobe? :/
On 2014-05-15 20:09, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2014-05-15 19:51 +0200, Eelis wrote:
I read[1] that Firefox will
I read[1] that Firefox will start shipping parts for which they won't
provide the source code (something to do with DRM..). Can I trust that
Iceweasel will remain open source, or will I have to switch to Lynx if I
want to use an open source browser? :)
Cheers,
Eelis
[1]
9 matches
Mail list logo
