Re: Imap && imap-ssl && pop3-ssl

through this; http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?EmailConfiguration http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?MaildirConfiguration Feel free to update these as you go :-) -- Donovan Baardahttp://minkirri.apana.org.au/~abo/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Securing bind..

On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 04:15:18AM +0100, jernej horvat wrote: > On Monday 31 December 2001 03:34, Michael D. Schleif wrote: > > > > > Because of that policy there are no precompiled packages of djbdns, because: > > "You may distribute a precompiled packag

Re: heard all the who-haha?

On Sat, 16 Aug 1997, Galen Hazelwood wrote: > Jens B. Jorgensen wrote: > > > Dear shellutils maintainer, > > > > Debian 1.3.1 sports a who which many are saying is "slow" while others > > > > are saying the slowness is due to slow named servers. Were there > > any notable changes leading up the t

Re: /etc/init.d structure [long rant]

On Fri, 15 Aug 1997, Dima wrote: > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Manoj Srivastava writes: > >> *Nothing* has an S* in more than one level. A package is meant to be at a > >> certain run level and higher. A level 3 package is started at run level > >> 3, killed in run level 2, and at *no* other

Re: /etc/init.d structure [long rant]

On Thu, 14 Aug 1997, Richard G. Roberto wrote: > On Thu, 14 Aug 1997, Donovan Baarda wrote: > > So excuse me if I have got this wrong, but does that mean going from run > > level 2 to run level 7 requires running all K* then S* in run level 3, > > then all K* then S* in ru

Re: /etc/init.d structure [long rant]

On Wed, 13 Aug 1997, Richard G. Roberto wrote: > On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > > There was a discussion about this recently... So I thought I'd mention this: > > This is posted on cola; looks neat to me: > > [snip] > The premise is that a run level is _clearly defined_ and >

Re: heard all the who-haha? (DNS resolver problems)

On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Al Youngwerth wrote: [snip] > > I believe it's your tcp wrappers in inetd.conf. If you aren't using the > security features that tcp wrappers gives you, just edit your inetd.conf > file so it doesn't use tcpd: > > From: > > telnet stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/

Re: "who" is guilty - "named" is not!!!

On 13 Aug 1997, Eloy A. Paris wrote: > Hello all, > > following the "who" vs. "named" controversy, I have found something that > leads me to think that the problem of "who" slowness is because of a > bug in "who" and not in "named" or because of incorrect DNS setup: > > It happens that when "who

Re: heard all the who-haha?

On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Brandon Mitchell wrote: > On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Kevin Traas wrote: > > > Is this lookup necessary? Is there a way to disable it? > > Try commenting out the PARANOID:ALL from /etc/hosts.deny (this is from > memory, so there may be typos). I'm guessing the dns info is cached

Re: heard all the who-haha? (slow reverse DNS lookups)

On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Kevin Traas wrote: > >Have you checked the name server entries in /etc/resolv.conf? DNS > >problems are often tracked down to this point. > > Yes, I have. I've got three entries in there. One is the local host entry > as I'm running BIND. The other two are DNS Servers o

kernal-package in stable not including config in /boot

G'day deb's Someone (Manoj?) mentioned that the new kernel-package creates kernel-image deb's that put the kernel config file in /boot. I just created a kernel-image using the kernel-package that comes in the stable distribution of debian 1.3.1, and it definitely didn't do this. Is this a feature

Re: Default caching bind config very slow??

On 12 Aug 1997, Eloy A. Paris wrote: > Lindsay Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > : I do not have any of these problems with who, but I notice > : one of my own. "w" and "who" give different answers. > > Well, I do not know exactly what you mean with "different answers" but > w and who are d

Subject: Re: IP forwarding in 2.0.30 kernel??

G'day debianers, I have now tried both kernel-image 2.0.29-7 and 2.0.30-7 in the stable distribution for Debian 1.3.1, and neither have a kernel config file in /boot, and neither seem to support IP forwarding. IP forwarding worked fine with the old Debian 1.2 kernel image 2.0.27. I notice ipx su

Re: Default caching bind config very slow??

ne has any ideas of what's going on with "who"? > > > > Thanks, > > > > E.- > > > > Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > : I am using bind as a caching name server and have found that it seems to > > : be

Default caching bind config very slow??

G'day all, I am using bind as a caching name server and have found that it seems to be very slow when doing reverse DNS lookups. In particular, it seems to be only caching them for about 5 minutes, and is very slow (up to 2 minutes) when it is not in the cache. It first showed up when using "who"

Re: IP forwarding in 2.0.30 kernel??

On Mon, 11 Aug 1997, Lindsay Allen wrote: > > This might help:- > > elm# ls /proc/net > alias_typesdevip_input ip_output rt_cache tcp > aliasesip_autofw ip_masq_apprawsnmp udp > arpip_forward ip_masquerade route so

IP forwarding in 2.0.30 kernel??

G'day all, I've installed the 2.0.30 kernel on my box that is working (Not!) as a router. It appears to not be forwarding anything. Has IP forwarding been turned off in the 2.0.30 kernel? How can I find out what the kernel configuration options used in a packaged kernel are? Is this a known probl