On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 05:54:27PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom
was heard to say:
> Sven Joachim wrote:
> >>The following packages will be REMOVED:
> >>... grub-legacy{a} ...
[snip]
> >>The following NEW packages will be installed:
> >>... grub-pc{a} ...
> >>
> >>So why does aptitude pay no attenti
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 06:00:32PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom
was heard to say:
> Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > It looks to me like something else required grub-pc, and that in
> >turn forced grub-legacy to be removed. You could try pinning grub-pc
> >at a very low priority to s
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:32:36AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom
was heard to say:
> but when I do 'aptitude full-upgrade' I see:
>
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> ... grub-legacy{a} ...
>
> and
>
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> ... grub-pc{a} ...
>
> So why does aptitu
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 01:24:23PM -0400, Rick Pasotto was
heard to say:
> I did send this to you but have not heard back. Just checking if I need
> to resend it.
No, I just haven't had time to analyze it.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 09:14:43PM -0500, Brian Ryans
was heard to say:
> In Aptitude, I can execute queued package modification orders (install,
> remove, etc) by use of 'aptitude install', with no arguments.
>
> How does one queue packages using only the command line? I'm looking to
> duplicat
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 11:15:27AM +0300, Panayiotis Karabassis
was heard to say:
> On 05/03/2010 01:28 AM, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> >>To illustrate suppose I want to search for package where a single
> >>version matches "~A^unstable$", "A^stable$"
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 12:07:02PM +0300, Panayiotis Karabassis
was heard to say:
> Hi! Is it possible to combine multiple filters in a ?narrow aptitude search.
> For example to search for package where a single version matches all
> of ?A, ?B and ?C.
Yes.
> To illustrate suppose I want to se
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 10:23:12PM +0200, James Stuckey
was heard to say:
> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > That's the problem -- you have no (active) "deb" lines for unstable,
> > so apt doesn't know which packages are from it.
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 10:09:32PM +0200, James Stuckey
was heard to say:
> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Did you mean to drop debian-user?
> >
> > On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 06:29:55PM +0200, James Stuckey <
> > jhstuc...@gmail.com> w
So, it turns out this is surprisingly tricky. The problem is that the
aptitude initialization process runs a mark-and-sweep before the whole
package system is ready. That seems very dicey to me, but the comments
seem to indicate that it's necessary to force apt to behave properly
with auto flag
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:46:13AM -0400, Tom H was heard
to say:
> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Mike Viau wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H was
> >> heard to say:
> >> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > You could find
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:37:24AM -0400, Mike Viau was
heard to say:
> > Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:10:56 -0700 wrote:
> > $ aptitude search '?narrow('?archive(unstable), ?installed)'
>
> debian01:~# aptitude search '?narrow('?archive(unstable), ?installed)'
>
> -bash: syntax error near unexpected
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:04:07AM -0400, Mike Viau was
heard to say:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H was
> > heard to say:
> > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You could find what all packages from sid are installed in your system
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 08:58:19PM -0700, Daniel Burrows
was heard to say:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:54:57PM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
> was heard to say:
> > My instinct is that '-t $something' effectively increases the priority of
> >
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:14:51PM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> I find that the more packages are automatically installed, the easier
> upgrades
> are, since aptitude seems more willing to preform a library transition on a
> "automatically installed" package.
It is.
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:54:57PM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> My instinct is that '-t $something' effectively increases the priority of all
> packages from the $something repository, which may make the dependency
> resolver pull more from that repository than is absolut
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H was heard
to say:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram wrote:
> >
> > You could find what all packages from sid are installed in your system by
> > apt-show-versions | grep unstable
>
> Or "aptitude search ~Aunstable"
or "aptitude
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 02:54:20PM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> If (c), aptitude will usually churn until it's solver exhausts all available
> memory and it either dies, or is killed by the OMM-killer in the kernel. You
> can 'Ctrl+C' to kill aptitude earlier if you wish
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 02:54:20PM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> On Monday 19 April 2010 08:16:02 B. Alexander wrote:
> > I've got an issue with a sid box that I have been maintaining for a while.
> > This is my workstation, and I have noticed a growing number of broken
> >
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 06:14:42PM -0400, Mike Viau was
heard to say:
> Both "aptitude search ~pextra ~smisc" and "aptitude search ~pextra search
> ~smisc" resulted in a list of package which did not necessarily meet both the
> search patterns specified.
That's because "aptitude search" impl
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 01:14:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu
was heard to say:
> On Mon,26.Apr.10, 10:29:06, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> > I just upgraded apt and aptitude to the latest testing version. Although
> > 'aptitude -s safe-upgrade' tells me that '172 not upgraded' it no longer
> > lists them. Is
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:12:17AM +, Rémi Moyen was
heard to say:
> 2010/2/11 Sven Joachim :
> > On 2010-02-11 08:30 +0100, Guy Marcenac wrote:
> >
> >> What is the meaning of [-107] in the status output of aptitude ?
> >> Current status: 0 updates [-107]
> >
> > It means that there are 107
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 09:31:28AM -0400, Rick Pasotto was
heard to say:
> Today's run of 'aptitude -s safe-upgrade' had been running for over an
> hour and was using half my memory when I killed it. The status line was:
>
> open: 107756; closed: 119093; defer: 107181; conflict: 167
>
> There's
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 09:59:19AM -0600, "Monique Y. Mudama"
was heard to say:
> I use "hold" liberally to weather Sid storms. There are two cases I
> see crop up: one, aptitude suggests removing packages without an
> obvious replacement. Two, aptitude marks things as broken that have
> been w
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:32:25AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> On Tuesday 27 April 2010 08:48:48 Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Essentially, it causes held packages to be added to the root
> > set (and that's the best implementation, I think: mod
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:29:06AM -0400, Rick Pasotto was
heard to say:
> I just upgraded apt and aptitude to the latest testing version. Although
> 'aptitude -s safe-upgrade' tells me that '172 not upgraded' it no longer
> lists them. Is this a bug or an intentional change?
That's ... a good
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 07:34:49PM -0600, ghe was heard to
say:
> On 4/25/10 7:10 PM, Richard Lawrence wrote:
>
> >http://losak.sourceforge.net/
>
> A Lisp OS!!???
>
> Could be, I guess. I once worked at a place where they claimed to
> have written an accounting package in BASIC. I think I'd s
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.2.1-2
aptitude's resolver will *still* upgrade held packages, due to an
interaction between the dependency solver and unused package removal.
Unused packages are removed before dependencies get solved, and
sometimes the dependency solver has to put a package "back"
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 05:44:20PM -0600, "Monique Y. Mudama"
was heard to say:
> For some reason, this just now triggered a memory for me. I think
> sometimes when aptitude is making suggestions to resolve conflicts, it
> will un-hold packages. I wonder if this is how your explicit hold gets
>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 03:27:28PM +, T o n g was
heard to say:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:33:14 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Can you provide any more information about this? It shouldn't happen
> > in any recent version of aptitude.
>
> I can only gi
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 03:22:00PM +, T o n g was
heard to say:
> I am talking about the *standalone* durep package. I don't like the new
> 0.9 version but rather prefer the old 0.8 version. However, even I've put
> it on hold in dpkg/aptitude, from time to time if I do a 'aptitude safe-
>
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 04:23:34PM +, Albretch Mueller
was heard to say:
> I would like to just carry my external drive, plug it in and do my
> thing. You are not supposed to be setting up servers in networks you
> don't own. "Simplicity" is not only good in a spiritual/Franciscan
> way. The
It would be easier to answer the question if you provided specific
examples of packages that apt-get didn't install and aptitude did. A
full copy/paste of the upgrade preview from both programs would be
particularly helpful.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debi
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 08:59:28PM -0500, Celejar was heard
to say:
> Hi,
>
> The package 'libx264-78' is installed on my (Sid) system:
>
> ~# aptitude why libx264-78
> i gnome-mplayer Depends mplayer (>= 1.0~) | mplayer-nogui (>= 1.0~)
> i A mplayer Depends libx264-78 (>= 1:0.svn200911
It should be UTF-8, but that doesn't mean it's not broken. The text
documentation is generated automatically via html2text, and that's been
buggy at various points, particularly with regards to encodings --
unless you have a specific reason for wanting plain text, I'd suggest
using the HTML docu
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 01:45:26AM -0600, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> Daniel, would you be terribly averse to a wishlist bug to make a separate
> configuration option for this?
No. The whole way that the lists are configured could probably use
an overhaul, actually. I wrote
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 01:29:54AM -0600, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> However, the lines I'd like to change look like:
> --\ Versions of e2fsprogs (2)
> i A 1.41.3-1
> p A 1.41.9-1
For package versions, "%p" turns into the version number; "%v" and
"%V" don't display anythi
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 01:34:11PM -0600, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> I use a mixed system, partially documented at
> On all of them, it would be quite nice if aptitude would give me just a
> /little _bit_/ more information about which archive a particular package
> version wa
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 02:04:16PM +0200, Jason Filippou
was heard to say:
> When I logged into my Debian partition, I
> realized that the system fonts had all been altered and made quite
> uglier and less readable and my system sounds aren't playing by
> default
This sounds a lot like you had
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 11:12:02PM +0100, Raven was heard to
say:
> What I wanted to know is if aptitude, when removing "mysql-server-5.0",
> keeps the data files and makes them available in v5.1.
I can't tell you the answer to that because aptitude does not make
that decision; the mysql packa
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 09:40:12AM +, AG
was heard to say:
> On one disk I found something that booted into the grub prompt. I
> did some reading up on grub and some basic commands. I didn't get
> very far - it reports back that there is an ext2fs loaded on
> /dev/hda1 which I'm assuming wa
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 07:36:10PM +0100, graham was
heard to say:
> Unpacking libhdf4-alt-dev (from .../libhdf4-alt-dev_4.2r4-6_amd64.deb) ...
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libhdf4-alt-dev_4.2r4-6_amd64.deb
> (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite `/usr/include/hdf/linklist.h',
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 05:20:29PM -0700, Chad Woolley
was heard to say:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > You're becoming root like this:
> >
> > $ run "sudo su -c 'echo \"#{pw_file}\" >
> > /var/cache
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:24:02AM -0500, Chris was
heard to say:
> The upgrade seemed to go well however, on reboot it failed to go into X.
> The suspected video culprit is nVidia Corporation GeForce 8400 GS (rev
> a1).
What's in the X server log? (usually /var/log/Xorg.0.log)
Daniel
--
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:42:57AM -0700, Chad Woolley
was heard to say:
> When scripting an aptitude install of mysql on ubuntu, how can I avoid
> blocking at aptitude's interactive root password prompt?
aptitude doesn't prompt for a root password at the command line.
> I tried the following
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 04:24:27PM +0200, Michael was heard
to say:
> ,[ /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/00local ]
> | // Aptitude should purge autoremoved packages
> | Aptitude::Purge-Unused true;
> `
>
> Many thanks !!
>
> Still i wonder, why is this not installation default ... ?
Deletin
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:40:11AM +0200, Guy Marcenac was
heard to say:
> While doing a safe-upgrade, my remote term crashed.
> When I relog into the system, the files are locked and I can see a running
> safe-upgrade in the background, likely waiting for an input.
> I am afraid of consistency p
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:25:49PM +0200, Leonardo Canducci
was heard to say:
> Liferea is not, at least when a feed shows only a few lines and links
> to the true article, and so other popular readers. AFAIK Straw was the
> only one truly offline reader but it's broken (in sid). Even google
> re
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 12:41:18AM +0900, Osamu Aoki was
heard to say:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 07:54:24AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 03:53:06PM -0400, Charles Kroeger
> > was heard to say:
> > > Thanks for that suggestion but I don
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 03:53:06PM -0400, Charles Kroeger
was heard to say:
> Thanks for that suggestion but I don't use aptitude..I use apt, dpkg, and
> smartpm.
>
> dpkg -P works but it would seem each package must be listed
> seperately. Is there a command that gets all the unpurged stuff i
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 07:54:18PM +0800, Gero Putzar
was heard to say:
> So "A: Breaks: B" is meant to read as "A would break B if it was going to be
> installed". I interpreted the "Breaks:" as "does not comply with the need
> for the following dependency".
That message just lists the depend
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 05:52:37AM -0400, Paul Cartwright
was heard to say:
> can we go a step further and ask what OTHER letters mean? I don't see this
> info under apt or apt-get.. where would it be?
{a} - package was automatically installed or removed.
{p} - package will be purged.
{u}
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 02:47:51PM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> Since GLib, Qt Core, LibBoost, and "C++1x" all provide C++
> bindings/abstractions of the threads, I would not write your own. I can't
> recommend for or against Boost, but one of those 4 should fit your pro
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 09:19:16PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
was heard to say:
> Michael Pobega wrote:
>
> > Mark, a GUI-less system is useless (unless it's some sort of server).
>
> You are kidding, right?
>
> It actually depends on what you are using it for. I use GUI-less systems all
>
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:59:03AM +0300, Andrei Popescu
was heard to say:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:14:55 -0700
> Daniel Burrows wrote:
>
> > (3) mutt takes *ages* to load large folders, particularly if they're
> > maildir based. ISTM that an on-disk
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 06:47:55PM -0400, Chris Jones was
heard to say:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 01:20:00AM EDT, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 28 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > On 2009-07-28 13:09, Mark wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > >> When I feel adventurous one weekend I'll try a Debi
Just a correction to my example here:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 07:25:48AM -0700, Daniel Burrows
was heard to say:
> $ mkdir foo
> $ echo > --test
> $ rsync --test foo
> rsync error: syntax or usage error (code 1) at main.cc(1440)
> [client=3.0.6]
>
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:49:47AM +0200, Csanyi Pal was
heard to say:
> Hi,
>
> my system is Debian GNU/Linux Lenny with linux-image 2.6.26-2-486.
>
> When I run:
>
> $ sudo aptitude
>
> and did update I get that there is three packages for sevurity updates
> available.
>
> When I hit 'g'
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:40:00AM -0700, Robert Holtzman was
heard to say:
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Mike Bird wrote:
>
> >On Mon July 27 2009 22:59:38 Robert Holtzman wrote:
> >>
> >>Just installed rsync 3.0.3-2 and tried to backup to a usb drive using a
> >>script:
> >>
> >>rsync -vaHz --exclude
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:44:42PM -0700, Bill Wohler was
heard to say:
> You hit the nail on the head. I ran memtest86+. The original block of
> memory came out clean. The new Mushkin memory had thousands of errors.
> Never seen that before.
>
> Wonder if that was related to the earlier issues
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 09:48:37PM -0700, Bill Wohler was
heard to say:
> Bill Wohler writes:
>
> > After making the following changes to pull in sid's bluez 4.0 package in
> > a lenny system, I'm now getting segmentation faults when I run dpkg and
> > aptitude. Any thoughts on how to recover f
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:40:48AM -0400, Charles was
heard to say:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:36:49 -0700
> Daniel Burrows wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 01:44:48PM -0400, Charles
> > was heard to sa
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 01:44:48PM -0400, Charles was
heard to say:
> Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > According to packages.debian.org, linux-image-2.6.29-2-686 does
> > not exist in any archive.
>
> Weird. but look at the screenshot.
>
>http://imagebin.ca
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:53:49AM -0400, Charles was
heard to say:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:26:10 -0700
> Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > The local or obsolete category in both aptitude and synaptic
> > consists of packages that are installed on your system but aren't
> &
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 09:26:32AM -0400, Charles was
heard to say:
> I'm running Debian testing --- in Synaptic I have a bunch of
> packages which are in the "local or obsolete category". Some have
> been locally installed...but most are those I had to re-install after
> a problem sometime ago.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:05:36PM +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz
was heard to say:
> First, let's see why aptitude wants do de-install a package:
>
> aptitude why-not
That won't do what you think. It only shows packages that conflict
with ; if the package is being removed because it's not
used a
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 07:30:19PM -0500, Ron Johnson
was heard to say:
>
> How would one go about computing a *single* hash value for a complete
> directory tree?
Depending on how important uniqueness is, you could just cat the
whole thing (sorting filenames first, of course) and pipe it to
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 09:27:49AM +0200, Rob Gom was
heard to say:
> Hi there,
> do you know any command line tool which would be able to display
> number of working days in given month in given country?
> I have found gcal, which suits my needs, but is barely maintained
> (last release in 2000)
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 05:00:27PM -0400, Hal Vaughan was
heard to say:
> Also, by the time I started using Java, I had learned that many times
> when I write something, I'm revisiting later and have forgotten it, so
> making sure my Javadoc comments were clear enough that I wouldn't have
>
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 04:47:30PM -0600, lee was heard
to say:
> Well, I tried that once, but there didn't seem to be any option
> available that would solve the problem.
If this is true, then either you found a bug in aptitude or there just
is no way to solve your dependency problem. I coul
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:13:38PM -0600, lee was heard
to say:
> I'm trying to upgrade my testing installation, but aptitude keeps yelp
> in its current state, claiming that upgrading yelp would break a
> dependency with gman. But gman is not even installed.
Do you mean the output from "full-
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:04:28AM +0800, 明覺 was heard
to say:
> dynamic typing is so easy, for every object is a piece of memory, so a
> dynamic type is just a memory type.
A wise man once said: everything is trivial, when you ignore
complexity.
(that's a lie: no wise man was involved,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 07:47:20AM +0200, Sven Joachim was
heard to say:
> On 2009-06-17 05:59 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:59:03PM +0200, Sven Joachim
> > was heard to say:
> >> On 2009-06-16 21:44 +0200, Jason Filippou wrote:
>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:59:03PM +0200, Sven Joachim was
heard to say:
> On 2009-06-16 21:44 +0200, Jason Filippou wrote:
> > Downgrade the following packages:
> > mktemp [1.6-4 (now) -> 1.5-9 (stable)]
> >
> > Score is 80
>
> I wonder why aptitude is suggesting this, downgrading mktemp would
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 09:36:34AM -0400, Patrick Wiseman
was heard to say:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Matus UHLAR -
> fantomas wrote:
> > why do you want to sun gnome-terminal under sudo, instead of running su/sudo
> > in gnome terminal?
>
> Doing the former allows me to open new tabs a
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 01:13:50PM -0400, Rick Pasotto was
heard to say:
> However, when I enter 'aptitude why-not locate' I'm told "Unable to find
> a reason to remove locate."
Just FYI, why-not tells you what would actively prevent the
installation of a package (i.e., what conflicts with it)
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:03:39AM +1200, Richard Hector
was heard to say:
> As an aside, I use the "It's all text" firefox plugin to let me fire up
> the editor of my choice (gvim, in my case) for any web text box.
>
> Then I'd use the editors features to format it. I can't remember how to
> do
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 05:38:43PM +0200, Sven Joachim was
heard to say:
> On 2009-06-04 18:16 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
> > I did:
> >
> > # aptitude purge mplayer
> >
> > . After that, the bash completion was still working for the `mplayer'
> > command,
>
> That's because bash reads t
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:06:49AM -0500, lee was heard
to say:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 12:09:53PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 11:55:11PM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
> > > > > So what did you use instead? I have never had trouble with using
> > > > > "eth
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 02:23:31PM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> In <20090529013505.ga12...@emurlahn.burrows.local>, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Adding versioned Provides would affect all the software that tries
> >to process Debian packages an
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:21:38AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> In <20090528153521.ga31...@emurlahn.burrows.local>, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> >On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:02:59AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
> was heard to say:
>
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:02:59AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> Isn't that supposed to change in the future (but perhaps not before Squeeze)
> so that we can have versioned dependencies on virtual packages?
Yes. It's been supposed to change in the future for at least t
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:59:50AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> You have the package "libwebkit-1.0-2" version "1.1.7-1". But, the package
> "midori" needs the package "libwebkit-1.0-1" version "1.0.1" or greater.
> Package names are only compared for equality; they are
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:08:59PM -0400, Chris Jones was
heard to say:
> There appear to be keyboards where some keys are physically located in a
> spot that's easily accessible with the thumbs.
>
> Maybe I should buy one?
On that note: one of my colleagues bought a keyboard with pedals a
f
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 09:39:13PM -0600, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> In <886fa7aa0905221547k21469037la882c5044a641...@mail.gmail.com>, Jason
> Filippou wrote:
> >The command 'man ncurses' brings up nothing (or, to be
> >more precise, an error message). When I connect to my depa
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:14:24AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> In <886fa7aa0905220106n791648e1v6b79acecc06b3...@mail.gmail.com>, Jason
> Filippou wrote:
> >Being new to Debian and running Squeeze I'm curious as to what the "Score
> > is x" line's supposed to mean when exa
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 10:02:57AM -0400, Patrick Wiseman
was heard to say:
> I did my daily testing update this morning, and aptitude has
> disappeared. Attempts to apt-get install aptitude are so far
> unsuccessful, because of unmet dependencies. Attempts to install
> those missing dependenci
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 08:51:28AM +0300, Andrei Popescu
was heard to say:
> On Sun,03.May.09, 10:18:49, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>
> > However, does the package management software (as aptitude does) store
> > user preferences in the home directory? If, for example, you always run
> > aptitude
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 03:06:54PM -0400, Walter Lundby
was heard to say:
> dpkg: warning - old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
> dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ...
> WARNING: python-gtk2-doc.private does not exist.
> Some bytecompiled files may be left
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:38:04AM +0200, Lorenzo Bettini
was heard to say:
> ll /usr/share/doc/libstdc++6-4.3-doc/libstdc++/html/
> total 132
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4045 2008-04-11 00:53 api.html
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1862 2008-02-12 03:39 bk02.html
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1821 2008-02-
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:56:08PM -0600, Paul E Condon
was heard to say:
> Are you aware of the documentation package for aptitude?
Yes. :-)
Daniel
(SCNR)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:23:55PM +0200, Lorenzo Bettini
was heard to say:
> Daniel Burrows wrote:
>> Manpages for STL classes are under the STL class name; e.g., try
>> "man std::string".
>>
>
> No, I meant doxygen documentation for the apis of C++ lib
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:13:38AM +, "J.M.Roth"
was heard to say:
> > >Oh and I guess to make things really right one would have to use
> > >--get-selections '*'
> > >during the backup, or an additional
> > >dpkg --clear-selections
> > >before the restore. Just a thought.
> >
> > --clear-se
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:54:56PM +0200, Lorenzo Bettini
was heard to say:
> Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>> hce wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I installed stl-manual in Debian, but it is HTML format, I cannot see
>>> from the man. Is there a STL manaual package in Debian I can use the
>>> man to display
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 01:08:50AM +0100, Alan Chandler
was heard to say:
> How can I get around this and force aptitude to ignore this broken
> dependency
You can't. You could try removing gitk, upgrading, then installing
it again.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ..
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 06:59:27AM +0200, Sven Joachim was
heard to say:
> On 2009-04-08 04:40 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:23:55AM +0200, Sven Joachim
> > was heard to say:
> >>
> >> But not the transition to kd
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:23:55AM +0200, Sven Joachim was
heard to say:
> On 2009-04-06 08:59 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> > On a side note, I never use the full-upgrade command because it has the
> > potential to remove a huge number of packages, and safe-upgrade handles
> > most situations
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:23:55AM +0200, Sven Joachim was
heard to say:
> On 2009-04-06 08:59 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> > On a side note, I never use the full-upgrade command because it has the
> > potential to remove a huge number of packages, and safe-upgrade handles
> > most situations
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:23:55AM +0200, Sven Joachim was
heard to say:
> Oh well. :-( Looks like I'll have to try the experimental aptitude.
Just FYI, I expect to upload a new version in the next week or two
with a whole pile of fixes for the dependency solver.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:59:39AM +0300, Itay was
heard to say:
> Then comes the 3rd one:
>
> checking for KDE... configure: error:
> in the prefix, you've chosen, are no KDE headers installed.
> This will fail.
> So, check this please and use another prefix!
Does installing kde-devel help?
1 - 100 of 667 matches
Mail list logo