Re: Setting volume size for dump

1997-11-11 Thread Claus-Justus Heine
"Jens B. Jorgensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Claus-Justus Heine wrote: > > > > > > Aren't these marks simply "file marks"? (just asking, I know that > > > > there are thos MTFSS/BSS/WSM tape operations, are these

Re: Setting volume size for dump

1997-11-08 Thread Claus-Justus Heine
> > Aren't these marks simply "file marks"? (just asking, I know that > > there are thos MTFSS/BSS/WSM tape operations, are these effectively > > different from the MTFSF/BSF/WEOF operations?) > > Yeah, it's a different beast. Trust, me, I can tell mt to find a mark > and it'll > skip over all kin

Re: Setting volume size for dump

1997-11-07 Thread Claus-Justus Heine
> Now all you need is a good script which will do a full dump and then put > incrementals after it on the same tape, right? Of course! I'm sending you > my perl backup script (which backs up *multiple* machines) via direct email > anyone else who's interested can have it to. My backup script has th

Re: Setting volume size for dump

1997-11-07 Thread Claus-Justus Heine
> 3. In setting the volume size, how can I correctly bring the compression > factor of using zftape into account? This is difficult. Generally, there is no easy way to predict any compressors efficiency unless one knows which kind of data is going to be compressed. When compressing ordinary files

[FAQ] Please read the FAQ [was: Re: Backup?!]

1997-10-28 Thread Claus-Justus Heine
he FAQ then use the mailing list, if the answers given in the FAQ are not clear enough, then please try to improve the FAQ. If you can't correct the answers yourself, then please drop a short note to the FAQ maintainer: Johan De Wit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> the Ftape maintaine