Re: providing default route

2003-09-21 Thread Chad M Stewart
e to 'man interfaces' for even more help. Thank you to Greg and Marc. -Chad- On Sunday, September 21, 2003, at 12:55 PM, Greg Folkert wrote: On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 12:10, Chad M Stewart wrote: Where is the proper place in debian to define the default route? I've got my own h

providing default route

2003-09-21 Thread Chad M Stewart
Where is the proper place in debian to define the default route? I've got my own hack, but I'd like to know the 'proper' place. -Chad- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Why such volume with W32/Swen@MM?

2003-09-21 Thread Chad M Stewart
I'm finding similar things here. I've had my domain a number of years and this is the first time I've been affected by an M$ email worm. Usually I sit back and laugh, but not this time. I'm new to the debian-* lists and recently posted for the first time. All of the copies of the virus have

Re: MS mail bombs

2003-09-20 Thread Chad M Stewart
I actually went through the trouble yesterday of setting up anti-virus software on my mail server. This is the first time that my personal email account has ever come under fire by an M$ virus, ugh! Makes me glad to be a Mac user. The rate seems to have slowed, at least for me, since yesterd

Re: dealing with testing and security

2003-09-19 Thread Chad M Stewart
On Friday, September 19, 2003, at 04:10 PM, Vineet Kumar wrote: * Chad M Stewart ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030919 12:18]: I'm tired of the stale nature of stable. Last weekend I upgraded to testing. I'm wondering what is the recommended method of dealing with security updates for te

dealing with testing and security

2003-09-19 Thread Chad M Stewart
I'm tired of the stale nature of stable. Last weekend I upgraded to testing. I'm wondering what is the recommended method of dealing with security updates for testing? Should I downgrade and only upgrade the few packages that I want newer versions of, like mailman, spamassassin, and bind. Th

Bind 9 chroot now slave/tmp- failed

2003-09-14 Thread Chad M Stewart
I'm rebuilding my secondary name server. I'm using debian/testing and bind 9.2.2. I have changed the default install/config to be in a chroot jail. Actually I'm going to run two instances of bind on this same box, both in their own chroot jails. I've got this working just fine on an older d