On 9/16/22 12:05 AM, Maude Summerside wrote:
>
> On 2022-09-15 17:56, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > On 9/15/2022 11:46 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 10:04:48PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> >>> I am not agai
On 9/15/22 6:29 PM, Lee wrote:
> On 9/15/22, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> >
> > So I have to pay someone lots of money to fix a problem I already know how
> > to fix?
> > I don't think you really understand my use case very well.
>
> I surely don't. If y
On 9/15/22 11:45 AM, Maude Summerside wrote:
>
> On 2022-09-14 23:23, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > On 9/14/2022 11:01 PM, Maude Summerside wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2022-09-14 21:45, Michael Stone wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 11:16:00PM +0100, Steve McIn
On 9/15/2022 11:46 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 10:04:48PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > I am not against giving maintainers like Steve just compensation for the
> > work they do fixing bugs, and by compensation I mean money.
>
> It
gi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983357
Thanks in advance for any tips from the udev experts.
Kind regards,
Chuck
actually fix the Debian software. The fact that Debian is created by
volunteers
is probably one of the really big disadvantages of Debian software.
Best regards,
Chuck
asonably small fee that would go to the
maintainers who worked on the bug and successfully fixed it.
I'll be brutally honest: Being accused of being a troll is *not* a
great way to convince Debian users who want to contribute to
and help Debian to spend their free time helping maintainers fix
the bugs reported to the BTS. I also suspect many users agree
with me, but are afraid to say so for fear of being accused of
being a troll.
Best regards,
Chuck
On 9/14/2022 9:06 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2022-09-14 at 08:51, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>
> > On 9/14/2022 1:03 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 03:41:11PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
>
On 9/13/2022 7:11 PM, Thiemo Kellner wrote:
> Am 13.09.22 um 23:55 schrieb Chuck Zmudzinski:
> >
>
> > I am fairly sure I was a victim of
> > the breach of Yahoo that affected hundreds of millions of its users.
> I am sorry for you. I do not know this case, so I cannot
On 9/14/2022 1:03 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 03:41:11PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Actually, someone already has shown us how to do it better. His name is
> > Linus Torvalds [...]
>
> I don't know what your aim is.
00
> > free software packages. That is just a fact, even it no one here
> > wants to acknowledge it.
>
> I haven't seen much evidence of trolls here, apart from yourself.
I did make the mistake of feeding a couple of trolls, from now on I will ignore
them.
They baited me into appearing as a troll by refusing to acknowledge a simple
truth
and forcing me to say the same obvious truth over and over again, and I
understand
why some people might be annoyed by that.
Chuck
On 9/13/2022 7:11 PM, Thiemo Kellner wrote:
> Am 13.09.22 um 23:55 schrieb Chuck Zmudzinski:
> > On 9/13/2022 4:14 PM, Thiemo Kellner wrote:
> > I think Megha is emphasizing, and possibly over-emphasizing, the fact
> > that the persons
> > who actually commit the cod
ersight particularly easy.
>
> For proprietary code you generally simply can't do that at all because
> it's all kept secret.
>
>
> Stefan
>
We really agree on this point, thanks.
Chuck
uly
open project can make it possible to find out which volunteers are not acting
in the true interests of those who advocate for the benefits of free/oss
software,
and this is not possible in secretive, proprietary organizations.
Best regards,
Chuck
fixed, so that the goals of
quality, useful,
safe, and secure software are reached.
Best regards,
Chuck
On 9/13/2022 4:14 PM, Thiemo Kellner wrote:
> Am 12.09.22 um 19:47 schrieb Chuck Zmudzinski:
> > "Open Source Software is accessible to all means it can be used and
> > misused.
> > And, that’s where it turns unconstructive for us. With OSS, we can expect
> > ha
t without more people, Debian cannot possibly provide quality support for
59,000 free software packages. That is just a fact, even it no one here wants
to acknowledge it.
Best regards,
Chuck
On 9/13/2022 2:33 PM, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 02:14:38PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> >So do you, obviously. Someone said something that raised that question in my
> >mind,
> >but you deleted that part from this message, which proves you are the one
On 9/13/2022 2:02 PM, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 12:42:12PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> >Software projects today, IIUC, are communities. The "volunteers" should do
> >what the community
> >wants, not necessarily what you or I want. Do you
On 9/13/2022 12:36 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 12:25:40PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I agree with that. But the price-performance ratio could be even better if
> > the "volunteers"
> > in free/oss softwa
On 9/13/2022 11:53 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:27:43AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> >On 9/13/2022 12:36 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 03:32:27PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> >>
> >> > [...] "I c
On 9/13/2022 11:44 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:27:43AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > On 9/13/2022 12:36 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 03:32:27PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > >
> > > > [...] &quo
On 9/13/2022 12:36 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 03:32:27PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
>
> > [...] "I can't get personalized/dedicated support with enforceable
> > SLAs for free"
If the requirement that maintainers and developers of free/oss software must
actually
fix the
On 9/12/22 3:32 PM, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 01:47:49PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> >Well, I suppose so, but I am pleased that a grub maintainer is now on the
> >case. Still,
> >there is another Debian bug that affects me that continues to be ig
On 9/12/2022 1:58 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2022-09-12 at 13:47, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>
> > On 9/12/2022 12:14 PM, David Wright wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon 12 Sep 2022 at 11:13:52 (-0400), Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>
> >>> The grub maintainers
On 9/12/2022 12:14 PM, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 12 Sep 2022 at 11:13:52 (-0400), Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > On 9/12/2022 12:55 AM, David Wright wrote:
> > >
> > > I would imagine a fix could follow quite quickly as it only requires
> > > rebuilding with a f
On 9/12/2022 11:36 AM, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2022, David Wright wrote:
>
> >
> > AFAICT it had two months in testing without this problem being
> > hit and reported.
> >
>
> Unfortunately, g-x-h is probably mostly used on stable or oldstable with
> guests running testing.
>
> I'm not
bug report on BTS. So I do not expect a fix very soon. The grub
maintainers
do not have the time or interest to fix it. Perhaps the Xen users could try to
convince the Xen maintainers to do an nmu to fix it if the grub maintainers
continue to ignore the bug, but I don't know if that breaks the
On 9/7/22 10:11 PM, David wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 11:44, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > On 9/7/22 7:45 PM, David wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 02:49, Chuck Zmudzinski
> > > wrote:
> > > > On 9/7/2022 12:13 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> &
On 9/7/22 7:45 PM, David wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 02:49, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > On 9/7/2022 12:13 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>
> > > I use the tigervnc-standalone-server which is in the Debian packages
> > > archives. I use it only on a trusted
On 9/7/2022 12:13 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> On 9/7/2022 4:41 AM, piorunz wrote:
> > On 07/09/2022 05:58, notoneofmyseeds wrote:
> > > On 07.09.22 06:19, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> > >
> > >>>
> > >> I've switched to NoMachine [1
have not tried
debugging it and I just enter the password when asked by the gnome desktop and
after the first time for each app or setting it won't ask again until I kill
the server and restart it.
Best regards,
Chuck
On 8/31/22 11:03 AM, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
> On 31/8/22 10:45 pm, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> >
> > I don't use haproxy but I see there is a package for it in the Debian
> > repos. I think what you are seeing should be reported as a bug in
> > haproxy if you are using
to
start, such as the network-online target which I think would be
enough for haproxy to start. But in any case, you might report a bug
in haproxy and see if the package maintainers can help you out if
you are using the Debian packaged version.
Best regards,
Chuck
com/virtualization/
Best regards,
Chuck
at, I think. Also, you might want to make sure you record the
upgrade session in a logfile so you can examine what the script actually did in
case there are problems. And of course, backup or take a snapshot beforehand so
you can restore the system back to a working state in case things get broken
badly.
HTH,
Chuck
On 8/20/22 4:28 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Chuck Zmudzinski [2022-08-20 16:20:21] wrote:
> > That's a fair point. It may not be so easy for me to work on a bug that
> > does not affect
> > my systems, but I am willing to help with bugs important to the Debian
&
affects a package on one
or more
of my systems, at least to tell the maintainer, "that proposed fix looks good,
it does not
break anything on my systems."
Thanks,
Chuck
> I don't think anyone can do that for any random bug, but I'm pretty sure
> most people on this list would be able to do that for at least one of
> the pending bug reports.
>
>
> Stefan
>
On 8/20/2022 1:25 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 05:06:38PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > On 8/19/2022 4:44 PM, piorunz wrote:
> > > On 19/08/2022 18:57, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have noticed that some
On 8/20/2022 1:25 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 05:06:38PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > On 8/19/2022 4:44 PM, piorunz wrote:
> > > On 19/08/2022 18:57, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have noticed that some
On 8/19/2022 9:18 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi Chuck,
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 08:20:21PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > On 8/19/2022 6:59 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
> > > Volunteers cannot be forced to do work, else they are not
> > > volunteers.
> >
On 8/19/2022 6:59 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 05:06:38PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > On 8/19/2022 4:44 PM, piorunz wrote:
> > > On 19/08/2022 18:57, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > > > I have noticed that some Deb
On 8/19/2022 6:43 PM, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 6:40 PM Chuck Zmudzinski
> wrote:
>
> On 8/19/2022 6:20 PM, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 5:07 PM Chuck Zmudzinski
> wrote
On 8/19/2022 4:44 PM, piorunz wrote:
> On 19/08/2022 18:57, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>
> > I have noticed that some Debian bugs are ignored for a long time, sometimes
> > even when the person who submitted the bug offered a patch. The Debian
> > developers/maintainers so
case with Debian
developers/maintainers?
Best regards,
Chuck
ion environment for your Windows installation. If for some reason
KVM/Qemu/libvirt does not work, then install Windows Pro on the Silent PC
and run Debian in Hyper-V. AFAIK, MS fully supports Debian in Hyper-V, and that
would also most likely be a reliable setup also for the real world to run
Debian 11
and Windows 10/11 simultaneously.
Chuck
n I know about is Virtualbox, which I also think can run on Debian
and supports
Windows VMs.
Best regards,
Chuck
l need to reinstall grub to update your grub so it can boot using
the
disk from the broken machine without dropping to the grub shell. For example,
If you use efi, you will need to reinstall grub-efi-amd64-bin or maybe
grub-efi-amd64-bin-signed for secure boot, and after that it should boot the
disk from the broken machine without dropping to the grub shell.
Chuck
On 6/15/22 7:14 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
> gene heskett composed on 2022-06-15 06:34 (UTC-0400):
>
> > What the heck is this vertical bar it uses for a quote level
>
> That's taken care of here with one or both of these two entries in prefs.js
> in the
> profiledir:
>
> user_pref("mail.quoteas
On 4/15/2022 6:58 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 10:34:25AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
I have an issue with a few websites that seem to hang with ipv6
If you happen to know their IPv6 addresses and can trust that those
assignments will remain stable then you may
em. I also note that according to the
Debian Wiki, Debian does not provide Hadoop packages:
https://wiki.debian.org/Hadoop
Regards,
Chuck
On 4/15/22 12:08 PM, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 11:21:46AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
Another improvement to the script would be to have the script toggle
the
default route on or off, depending on the existence or not of the
On 4/15/22 11:12 AM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
On 4/15/2022 10:50 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 10:34:25AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
user@debian:~$ cat ipv6
#!/bin/bash
if [ $1 == "on" ]
then
ip -6 route add default via dev
elif [ $1 == &q
On 4/15/2022 10:50 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 10:34:25AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
user@debian:~$ cat ipv6
#!/bin/bash
if [ $1 == "on" ]
then
ip -6 route add default via dev
elif [ $1 == "off" ]
then
ip -6 route delete default
f
r a certain network or
class of networks, or only temporarily, deleting the ipv6 route to that
network or class of networks or to the default route might be a solution
for your issue.
Regards,
Chuck
On 3/29/22 3:16 PM, Joe wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 14:36:55 -0400
Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
I do like synaptic also because it saves a history of all the
changes that it makes to the system.
The apt tools also do this, but in a more user-hostile way. See
/var/log/apt/history.log.
This
On 3/29/22 10:46 AM, Joe wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 17:54:23 -0400
Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
On 3/28/22 5:35 PM, Ash Joubert wrote:
On 29/03/2022 03:34, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
I am new to running the unstable sid distribution. Today I wanted
to upgrade it and when using the dist-upgrade
and the most recent kernels are
about where i end up. :)
songbird
I am now running Sid mainly to try to fix a bug in Xen upstream, and the
newer the version of Xen I test on, the better.
All the best,
Chuck
On 3/28/22 5:35 PM, Ash Joubert wrote:
On 29/03/2022 03:34, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
I am new to running the unstable sid distribution. Today I wanted to
upgrade it and when using the dist-upgrade option of apt-get (I think
that's equivalent to the full-upgrade option of apt), I got
On 3/28/22 10:52 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 10:34:01AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
The problem is with the section that lists the packages that will be
REMOVED.
It looks like the upgrade to the python3 packages that remove/replace some
existing python3 packages
On 3/28/2022 10:52 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 10:34:01AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
I am new to running the unstable sid distribution. Today I wanted to upgrade
it and when using the dist-upgrade option of apt-get (I think that's
equivalent to the full-up
samba and xen-utils-4.16, which I do not want, so I aborted it. Can I
expect that in due time, the python3 dependencies will be updated so the
full upgrade can succeed without removing the xen-utils-4.16 and samba
packages?
Thanks,
Chuck
.
Regards,
Chuck Zmudzinski
login
attempt as Bob.
Regards,
Chuck
On 2/18/2022 12:36 PM, Christian Britz wrote:
Mr. Anderson,
can you login to the command line?
If so, you could check the file .xsession-errors in your home directory.
You can also switch with "Bob" to Xfce for testing purposes.
If you can&#x
o boot the system. This
is a useful feature for those who know how to use it, and it has saved
me from having to reinstall on more that one occasion.
Chuck
On 2/13/2022 11:23 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Du, 13 feb 22, 02:40:27, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
This is my understanding of how grub works.
It looks you are using the old MBR partitioning scheme. The logical
partition indicates that.
So I also assume you are using the legacy booting (not UEFI
n
/etc/default/grub to handle the case when you do not select an OS before the
timeout expires.
After that, you just run sudo update-grub from your Debian system and
then on the next
reboot the grub menu should have entries for both kali and Debian.
Cheers,
Chuck
On 2/7/2022 4:36 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 04:31:51PM -0500, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
On 2/7/2022 10:50 AM, William Lee Valentine wrote:
I am wondering whether a current Debian distribution can be installed
and run on an older Pentium III computer. (I have Debian 11.2 on
such an old system working well with modern software.
There are also antiX 21 packages, but the blog page does not advertise
version 21 as a release, perhaps it is a development or beta version
based on bullseye.
Good luck,
Chuck
If I install Debian 11.2, will it run on this machine? Will it
at startup.
In my experience, once when I changed some packages the network
interface name changed and that caused my network interface to not come
up properly at startup. To fix it, I had to tweak the systemd configuration.
All the best,
Chuck
ntfs-3g man page.
As is said at the beginning of this reply, read the ntfs-3g man page!
HTH,
Chuck
On 11/26/2021 3:29 AM, lists.deb...@netc.eu wrote:
Hello to all,
I have a dual boot PC with Windows 10 and Debian 11
This PC has 2 drives, one SSD that has both operating systems and a
HDD where I
On 10/20/2021 4:01 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
On 10/20/2021 4:06 AM, Julius Hamilton wrote:
Hey,
I’d like to run a desktop in VNC and open GUI browsers like Firefox
in it.
I succeeded in setting up the VNC server but after installing
Firefox, Chromium and Chrome I find they don’t open
r.
I also use Xen and Xen's built-in VNC server also works fine with
firefox in my experience - Xen's built-in VNC server allows access
to Debian running in Xen unprivileged domains from any VNC
viewer, but that is probably a niche use case.
Cheers,
Chuck
On 9/28/2021 11:34 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 07:10:08AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
As the original poster, I can say this hits the nail on the head.
Most definitely, Andy Smith and others claim a right to call
newcomers like me a laughingstock, damned, etc., on
On 9/28/2021 10:23 AM, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
Chuck Zmudzinski wrote on 28/09/2021 at 13:10:08+0200:
On 9/27/2021 9:18 PM, Borden wrote:
I sympathise with your frustrations.
The open source "community" - especially Debian - is not known for
its civility. There have bee
ransomware, etc.) so most people have no choice but to pay them
for their commercial products and security solutions, and it is not good
for their bottom line if too many people can get a secure, bug-free
product for free. Again, if Debian accepts my patch for my bug, then I
would stand corrected.
Chuck
On 9/26/2021 7:28 AM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
On 9/26/2021 7:18 AM, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 25, 2021 12:58:44 PM Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
I am truly sorry, are there second chances in the Debian Community?
I hope and trust so -- I've had to make use of them more
On 9/26/2021 7:18 AM, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 25, 2021 12:58:44 PM Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
I am truly sorry, are there second chances in the Debian Community?
I hope and trust so -- I've had to make use of them more than once ;-)
... That is why defamation is no
ular bug, but I have followed it all as I
have an interest in the team's work. ]
It's not outrageously objectionable, it's just not a very good bug
report with some *slightly* objectionable elements and background.
This whole thing is pretty mundane and has been blown out of all
On 9/24/2021 8:04 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 07:45:03 -0400
Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
Hello Chuck,
happened to me, but I would not be surprised
if in the U.S. eventually Debian will get sued
unless it scrubs its website of some of the
In the USA, Section 230 covers this
On 9/24/2021 8:04 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 07:45:03 -0400
Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
Hello Chuck,
happened to me, but I would not be surprised
if in the U.S. eventually Debian will get sued
unless it scrubs its website of some of the
In the USA, Section 230 covers this
On 9/24/2021 10:10 AM, Jonathan Carter wrote:
Hi Chuck
On 2021/09/24 13:45, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
I was accused in public of wrongdoing on the
Debian bug tracking system which is hosted
on a public, Debian website in response to a
bug report I made.
Since Debian's policy is to
On 9/24/2021 9:19 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 07:45:03AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
I was accused in public of wrongdoing on the Debian bug tracking
system
That is an interesting point of view, but I think you were simply
accused of being factually wrong and creating a
On 9/24/2021 9:19 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 07:45:03AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
I was accused in public of wrongdoing on the Debian bug tracking
system
That is an interesting point of view, but I think you were simply
accused of being factually wrong and creating a
I was accused in public of wrongdoing on the
Debian bug tracking system which is hosted
on a public, Debian website in response to a
bug report I made.
Since Debian's policy is to keep everything
on its website public, and I was told every
message I send regarding Debian must be
put on Debian's p
On 8/24/2021 2:51 AM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
I don't know when an official fix will come , but I have come up with
a workaround that works for me:
Congrats. Great investigation work, as far as i can judge as bystander.
So it's only the initrd and not
On 8/19/2021 3:11 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi Chuck,
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 08:04:43AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
After some testing of the Debian 11 installer on Xen
(using the debian-11.0.0-amd64-netinst.iso), I find that
this image only supports installation into a Xen PV guest,
the guest
On 8/21/2021 7:06 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
On 8/21/2021 5:52 AM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
there might be an easier way (still depending on whether such simple
file replacements are tolerated by the booting system):
# Choose the desired new files
new_kernel
s a larger buffer than the one
provided by the installation kernel.
Any ideas how to fix this in the installation kernel?
Chuck
,
whether this perky change is tolerated.
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
Hi Thomas,
Thank you for these tips. I will use them to try to get a bullseye
Debian installer ISO working in a Xen HVM DomU next week
when I have some spare time and post the results here.
All the best,
Chuck
On 8/19/2021 3:11 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi Chuck,
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 08:04:43AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
After some testing of the Debian 11 installer on Xen
(using the debian-11.0.0-amd64-netinst.iso), I find that
this image only supports installation into a Xen PV guest,
the guest
On 8/21/2021 4:34 AM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
John Mok wrote:
As a quick fix on the make installer media work, how can I remake my own
installation ISO by recompil ing the kernel and initramfs ?
Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
A quick solution would not even require any recompilation
of a kernel
On 8/21/2021 12:08 AM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
On 8/19/2021 3:11 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi Chuck,
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 08:04:43AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
After some testing of the Debian 11 installer on Xen
(using the debian-11.0.0-amd64-netinst.iso), I find that
this image only
On 8/21/2021 12:42 AM, John Mok wrote:
Hi Chuck,
As a quick fix on the make installer media work, how can I remake my
own installation ISO by recompil ing the kernel and initramfs ?
Can give me some directions ?
Not yet regarding what kernel options are needed, because
I have not done any
On 8/19/2021 3:11 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi Chuck,
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 08:04:43AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
After some testing of the Debian 11 installer on Xen
(using the debian-11.0.0-amd64-netinst.iso), I find that
this image only supports installation into a Xen PV guest,
the guest
On 8/17/2021 8:04 AM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
On 8/16/2021 4:25 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 02:30:33PM +0800, John Mok wrote:
Hi all,
Tried to install Debian 11 guest using netinst, but the installer
crashed and reboot automatically.
Host: Xen 4.11.4 on Debian 10
ot just by tweaking
the xl.cfg configuration file after getting the image configured
for such a setup. I can even boot the same image on
the bare hardware by tweaking the initramfs-tools
configuration in the installed bullseye image.
Chuck Zmudzinski
On 8/16/2021 1:40 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
On 8/16/2021 12:49 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
On 8/16/2021 4:25 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 02:30:33PM +0800, John Mok wrote:
Hi all,
Tried to install Debian 11 guest using netinst, but the installer
crashed and reboot
On 8/16/2021 12:49 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
On 8/16/2021 4:25 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 02:30:33PM +0800, John Mok wrote:
Hi all,
Tried to install Debian 11 guest using netinst, but the installer
crashed and reboot automatically.
Host: Xen 4.11.4 on Debian 10
ths ago. I have not tried the bullseye debian installer
on the xen hypervisor. Maybe for installing bullseye on xen you can try
installing buster first then upgrade it to bullseye if the debian bullseye
installer does not work on the xen hypervisor.
Chuck Zmudzinski
1 - 100 of 269 matches
Mail list logo
