On 10/27/2020 6:54 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
What release are you running (stable, testing, unstable, etc.)? The
package in stable will only receive security updates.
I'm running unstable. But if I've got the dates right, some of them were
reported before Buster became stable.
I suppose my m
Recently I wanted to try out an open source game that was being
distributed as a snap package, so I tried installing snapd. It
apparently installed successfully, and I could apparently install snap
packages, but I couldn't execute them. Long story short, I eventually
made my way to bugs.debian.
Yes, filed since I last checked:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946289
On 12/6/2019 12:09 PM, songbird wrote:
Brian Vaughan wrote:
someone already filed a bug for this (by a quick look
at ufw bug reports).
note that iptables version 1.8.3-2 (current testing version
me like both in /sbin and in /usr/sbin, there are symlinks
from the names of the old iptables executables to the nftables versions,
via /etc/alternatives. So I'm not sure what was actually changed, but
now I'm thinking that the iptables update revealed an issue with ufw.
On 12/5/19 10
I saw today that ufw.service was failing on boot. From the error
messages I get when executing 'ufw enable' (see below), it looks like
nftables is not accepting the format of the rules from ufw. I've also
tried 'ufw reset', but that didn't change the behavior.
I'm using ufw-0.36-1 and nftables
5 matches
Mail list logo
