Re: Redhat to Debian: migrating a multi-user server

2000-12-15 Thread B. Dragoo
--- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's perfectly safe to keep those users starting at > 500. Debian > packages that want an id in the 100-999 range will > dynamically allocate > it with adduser, which will never trample over an > existing user, and it > doesn't matter what user id it p

Re: Redhat to Debian: migrating a multi-user server

2000-12-15 Thread B. Dragoo
--- Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > uid's 100 - 999 are reserved for the packaging > system/daemons etc. > you won't likely have a problem but it would be > better to migrate to > debian policy anyway. Yeah, that's about how I'm thinking about it, too. Debian goes through so much to

Re: Redhat to Debian: migrating a multi-user server

2000-12-15 Thread B. Dragoo
--- Ernest Johanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > One idea might be to do a search and replace on the > passwd file, placing a > 1 (or 2, etc) in front of the existing user id. That > would necessitate > changing the ids on the user's files. I had a > similar situation and wrote > a Perl sc

Redhat to Debian: migrating a multi-user server

2000-12-14 Thread B. Dragoo
This is not a "Which is better, Red Hat or Debian?" question, but a very specific question about a distro migration of one specific box. I've done a lot of research on this, and have found no answers particular enough to my situation. The box in question is still running RH 5.2 (with all security