Re: Anyone using stretch/buster/sid on ARMv4t ?

2017-11-08 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 12:52:05AM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote: >> >>... OMAP15xx is frequently tested and used >> by OMAP1 hackers (thanks to Amstrad Delta). > > But is anyone still using Debian on OMAP15xx? > > Looking at the amount of RAM in t

Re: Anyone using stretch/buster/sid on ARMv4t ?

2017-11-07 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 10:36:57PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> - TI OMAP15xx was based on ARM925, we support exactly one machine >> with it (HTC Herald phone, a.k.a. T-Mobile Wing), I'd call it dead

Re: Anyone using stretch/buster/sid on ARMv4t ?

2017-11-07 Thread Arnd Bergmann
To clarify which platforms are affected by moving from ARMv4T to ARMv5TE, here is what the kernel supports in principle for people that just use the debian packages but build their own kernels: ARMv4 (prior to ARMv4t) machines are: - StrongARM 110 based: RiscPC, EBSA110, Footbridge/NetWinder: the