Re: Still not fixed ipup problem. (solved)

removing the package: zeroconf solved this issue for me. On Fri, 08 Jul 2005, Alan Chandler delivered in simple text monotone: > On Friday 08 July 2005 07:54, Arias Hung wrote: > > Okay, I've been having this exact same problem the last week or two and > > have had t

Re: Still not fixed ipup problem.

Okay, I've been having this exact same problem the last week or two and have had to resort to manually bringing up eth0 with dhclient. the auto ifup always assigns me that bogus 169.254.x.x address too ... very annoying. What I think this is related to though for me is a recent aborted install

Re: Re: Need help! I upgraded to stable - bad move

You never mentioned anything about a kernel upgrade. In your prior message you mentioned changing distros from unstable to stable. It helps if you can be very precise if anyone is to know what your problem is. On Wed, 06 Jul 2005, Björn Johansson delivered in simple text monotone: > > Now it

Re: Need help! I upgraded to stable - bad move? :-(

Bad move. You mean you 'downgraded' to stable since stable uses much older packages than unstable. Use a rescue cd ... take your pick ... knoppix, kanotix, sysresccd, any of the gentoo live cd's. Boot that cd, then mount the partition with the files you want to save. Grab those. Then, if yo

getting bad preempt magic errors when loading modules after recompile with gcc-3.4

After a recent recompile using gcc-3.4 (up from 3.3), I'm getting these bad preempt errors: kernel: dm_mod: version magic '2.6.11-cko5 preempt K7 gcc-3.4' should be '2.6.11-cko5 preempt K7 gcc-3.3' May 19 14:38:17 kernel: scsi_mod: version magic '2.6.11-cko5 preempt K7 gcc-3.4' should be '2.6.11-c

Re: [OT] Debian advocacy for Smart but Scared People With Lives

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Andy Firman wrote: > Now he is bragging about it to all the other Cops at the Police > Department and they all want Linux desktops now. I thought the subject implied that they had lives too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

Re: Mail Server Questions

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Phil Bardanes wrote: > Hi, noob here. > > We have five machines running various OSes (only one Windows box) with a > Debian sarge business server on our private network. Everything is run > through a dedicated firewall using iptables rules for NAT, packet > filtering, port f

Re: What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?

On this revelational Saturday, of the seventh month of 2004 you wrote: > And if this happens with something like glibc, you're hosed. Okay, I just happen to be the poor sod you were referring to in this nugget I found in the archives of just three months ago. What's worse is that my carelessnes