Mark Ferlatte wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 12:18:56PM +1100, Andrew Nesbit wrote (1.00):
Error: /invalidfont in findfont
I'm running unstable, with GNU GhostScript 6.51. Any help in getting
this to work would be appreciated.
Do you have the gsfonts package installed?
Aha!
I cannot read any PostScript files. Whenever I try to load a document
into gv I get an error from GhostScript:
Error: /invalidfont in findfont
I'm running unstable, with GNU GhostScript 6.51. Any help in getting
this to work would be appreciated.
TIA
-Andrew
Okay, so install-keymap places its boottime keymap in
/etc/console/boottime.kmap.gz. That's fine. The question is this: how
can I know from which keymap this file was generated from?
TIA
-Andrew
Joel Mayes wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lamport's _LaTeX: A Document Preparation System_ and _The LaTeX Companion_
are good (the first is more of an introduction, the second a reference
book). Also check out http://www.tug.org/
I am trying to get apt-get to work through a SOCKS v5 server, but so
far, it doesn't seem to like Dante's socksify.
I heard that Dante is broken with respect to blocking, but I don't know
about how to get any alternatives to work. Does anybody know how to
accomplish this? Thankyou.
-Andrew
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 20:16:25 +1100, Andrew Nesbit wrote:
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-base_1.0.2+20011202-1_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf/xdvi/xdvi.cfg', which is also in
package tetex-bin
What hap
I got dependency trouble (in unstable) when trying to do apt-get
dist-upgrade, and so I gave it apt-get -f install.
The following error has deadlocked my whole upgrade path:
Unpacking replacement tetex-base ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-base_1.0.2+20011202-1_all.deb
Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 05:30:24PM +1100, Andrew Nesbit wrote:
Whenever I try to view manpages that don't exist on my system, I get the
following error:
man: can't open /usr/X11R6/man/man1/bitmap.1x: No such file or directory
man: warning: /usr/X11R6/man/man1/a
Whenever I try to view manpages that don't exist on my system, I get the
following error:
man: can't open /usr/X11R6/man/man1/bitmap.1x: No such file or directory
man: warning: /usr/X11R6/man/man1/atobm.1x.gz: bad symlink or ROFF `.so' request
and then I have to press ^C get back to the prompt
asl wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Osamu Aoki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "asl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: mysteriously locked terminal
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 06:22:32PM +0900, asl wrote:
I am using potato.
When I press Control
What is the difference between pinning a package (as described in the
APT HOWTO), and setting the ``hold flag'' using dpkg?
Do APT and dpkg respect each other's methods of ``holding''?
TIA
-Andrew Nesbit
> not all systems work good with DMA on. especially some VIA
> chipsets. i had major problems with DMA on them so i stopped
> using the onboard ide and started using promise ata100 cards
> in their place.
>
> older motherboards are even worse
A little while ago I heard that this is due to fundamen
What is the default DHCP client with Debian? Is it dhclient or dhcpcd?
TIA
-Andrew
Hello. Is there some way of making a Woody CD using the pseudo image kit?
All Debian FTP archives for Woody seem to be missing many packages which are
clearly listed in the packages list on the main website. Why is this? For
example, I cannot find the XFree86 4.1.0 package on any FTP site. I also
> > Hello. I am still preparing to install Debian, but I am not sure of
> > what the default MTA is. I get the impression that it is exim, but I
> > have not been able to find any definitive answer anywhere in the
> > Debian Documentation Project. How is one supposed to find out this
> > sort of in
Hello. I am still preparing to install Debian, but I am not sure of what the
default MTA is. I get the impression that it is exim, but I have not been
able to find any definitive answer anywhere in the Debian Documentation
Project. How is one supposed to find out this sort of information?
And anot
> i have an geforce2 mx as well, running potato, the nvidia_kernel and
> nvidia_glx, xfree 4.0.3 and believe me, unrealtournament at 1280x1024 at
> 32bits is f&^%$ng sweet ;-)
> so, 4.1.0 is not mandatory, BUT since the 2.4.8-acsomething there are some
> new implementations of DRI in the kernel, wh
hi ho... I will be installing Debian 2.2r3 (Potato) for the first time soon,
but as I understand, it comes with XFree86 3.3.6. The problem is that I
really need XFree86 4.1.0 (due to my NVidia GeForce2 MX).
What's my best plan of attack? Should I install the base Potato system, and
then just insta
18 matches
Mail list logo
