On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 12:59:35PM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Greg Wooledge composed on 2021-10-21 09:27 (UTC-0400):
>
> > Now, knowing that this is a piece of hardware that was released in 2021,
> > I would *not* attempt to run Debian 9 on it. You *might* be able to
> > run Debian 11 on it, if
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 08:09:20AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> alt...@emypeople.net wrote:
> > In general I'm wondering if it is possible to upgrade an older Debian
> > system to be compatible with newer hardware, without upgrading the whole
> > system to a later Debian version?
> >
> >
> > In
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 08:59:09PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 19 Sep 2018 at 14:41:24 -0500, Jason wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 01:32:47AM -0300, Felipe Portales wrote:
> > > El domingo, 16 de septiembre de 2018 17:15:16 -03, Glenn English escribió:
> > > > Anybody know of a civilized, b
v/sdb: 1023.8 MiB, 1073479680 bytes, 2096640 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
>
> Martin
>
>
> Am 13.09.2018 um 23:16 schrieb Allen Hoover:
> > I have an SS
I have an SSD that has some serious issues. It contains files that
are fairly important to recover. The user had not done backups quite
recently.
If I view the SSD in parted, it says unrecognized disk label, and the
size is shown as 1073MB instead of 120GB as it should.
I have another SSD here t
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 07:23:35PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:03:14AM -0600, Sergio Arana wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
> first of all: don't just "answer" to a mail in the
> list with another new topic. This is called "thread
> hijacking" and confuses the hell out of
>
> > Let a car move like a Hooverboat!
> >
>
> Um, any search results for that are likely to be spelling mistakes ... I
> think the word you're after is 'hover' :-)
>
> Richard
>
Hoover looks totally fine to me!!
Regards,
Allen Hoover
-Original Message-
> From: Brian
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: 08/09/18 11:25
> Subject: Re: Brother or Canon; not both
>
> On Thu 09 Aug 2018 at 11:10:44 +0100, Brian wrote:
>
> > On Wed 08 Aug 2018 at 19:12:09 -0500, Allen Hoover w
> On Wed 08 Aug 2018 at 19:12:09 -0500, Allen Hoover wrote:
>
> > Ever since upgrading some customized Debian 64bit systems to Debian 8, I've
> > had trouble with the Canon UFRII printer drivers. I've now been
> > testing this issue on a vanilla Debian 8, and
Ever since upgrading some customized Debian 64bit systems to Debian 8, I've
had trouble with the Canon UFRII printer drivers. I've now been
testing this issue on a vanilla Debian 8, and Debian 9 system with the
same issues on both.
I use official Brother printer drivers which are i386 only, so ha
10 matches
Mail list logo
