Re: where does unstable appear from?

2015-11-03 Thread Alex Moonshine
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 19:40:54 + Joe wrote: > No, it doesn't, sometimes a judicious bit of butchery is required to > clear a dependency jam. I waited for quite a while recently, when > apt-get wanted to rip out a fair number of packages which I use, and > aptitude just threw up its virtual hands

Re: where does unstable appear from?

2015-11-03 Thread Alex Moonshine
On 11/03/2015 05:19 PM, The Wanderer wrote: When tracking sid, the biggest problems you're likely to encounter cannot easily be fixed in-place at all; you're likely to need to reinstall Debian from scratch. I have encountered this twice, and that's more than enough. The latter is, IMO, by far

Re: where does unstable appear from?

2015-11-03 Thread Alex Moonshine
On 11/03/2015 04:06 PM, The Wanderer wrote: So far, the only structural problem I've had with testing has been in the grub-related packages, in the form of longstanding open bugs reported by people whose computers became unbootable after a grub upgrade (which may have been related to the trans

Re: where does unstable appear from?

2015-11-03 Thread Alex Moonshine
Also, not installing the latest version - installing the package at all, as it is absent from testing entirely.

Re: where does unstable appear from?

2015-11-03 Thread Alex Moonshine
On 11/03/2015 06:15 AM, Chris Bannister wrote: You mean your suggestion to install Sid? I agree. Suggesting that someone run sid just so that they can have the latest package, is IMHO, very cruel. To someone who runs stable - sure. He's running testing, though, which is more troublesome, in

Re: Iceweasel updates

2015-11-02 Thread Alex Moonshine
On 11/02/2015 03:22 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: But some videos are not supported with official precompiled Firefox versions due to obsolete gstreamer: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=947287 Oh, right. I use gstreamer from http://www.deb-multimedia.org/ Yes, I know I just said us

Re: Iceweasel updates

2015-11-02 Thread Alex Moonshine
Not really a solution to OPs problem, but I've decided that it's much easier to just use a stand-alone precompiled Firefox downloaded from Mozilla website, which happily updates itself. Debian's update policy for Iceweasel is far from ideal or comprehensive, using third-party repositories is bo

Re: where does unstable appear from?

2015-11-02 Thread Alex Moonshine
On 11/02/2015 12:58 PM, Andrey Rybak wrote: thanks for your answer. its very strange for me that it is not possible to use filezilla in testing. i was using testing brunch in several years and filezilla was presenting in there. am i right? is it ok if i will change "testing" to "stratch"? No

Re: where does unstable appear from?

2015-11-02 Thread Alex Moonshine
Testing/unstable is just a common release name for testing AND unstable. Your sources.list is fine. Filezilla package isn't present in testing/stretch (see https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/filezilla). In fact, if you were running sid, you'd be able to install it.

Re: Anybody know why aptitude is not installed by default in Sid?

2015-11-01 Thread Alex Moonshine
On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 16:52:37 -0700 Rick Thomas wrote: > As shown below, aptitude has been progressively downgraded from > “important” in oldstable (Wheezy) to “standard” in stable (Jessie), > “standard” in testing (Stretch) and finally to “optional” in unstable > (Sid) > And exim4 has gone from

Re: X not working after apt-get upgrade on sid

2015-10-28 Thread Alex Moonshine
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 02:44:10 + (UTC) John DeVito wrote: > I ran into an issue today where X is not working after andupgrade of > Stretch.  The pervasive errorI am seeing is related to dbus-core. > Xorg.0.log says ... Failed to connect to > socket /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket.  Manual attem

Re: alsa troubles

2015-10-19 Thread Alex Moonshine
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:12:21 -0600 Glenn English wrote: > On 10/19/2015 04:04 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > I almost hardly dare say it, it is barely better than saying > > s*d, but when I have a problem with sound, I install Pulse > > Audio, install pavucontrol, and have a look at what it say

Re: claws-mail does not display menu-bar

2015-10-16 Thread Alex Moonshine
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:18:58 -0700 wrote: > that's horrible UI design. Menu bar goes away without a hint of how > to get it back ? > Ever tried pressing F10 in Firefox?:) -- Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. Best wishes, Alex S.

Re: systemd alternative for Jessie?

2015-10-14 Thread Alex Moonshine
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 21:51:17 +0200 Arno Schuring wrote: > The last time I wrote an init script: > > - copy /etc/init.d/skeleton > - edit the DAEMON= and DESC= lines I'll be completely honest, I just never understood sysvinit. I'm alright with bsd-style Slackware single-rc.d-folder layout, where

Re: systemd alternative for Jessie?

2015-10-14 Thread Alex Moonshine
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 07:49:08 -0500 Richard Owlett wrote: > What has the end-user, with a single machine, gained today from > the adoption of systemd? Speaking for myself: 1. It took me an hour of googling to write my own working init script. It takes me 10 minutes to write my own systemd unit.

Re: systemd alternative for Jessie?

2015-10-14 Thread Alex Moonshine
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:55:36 -0700 tom arnall wrote: > i read the piece on installing without systemd. i get the feeling > that the bottom line of it is: good luck. or am i missing something? http://without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/How_to_remove_systemd_from_a_Debian_jessie/sid_installation t

Re: which image shall I use for P4/2.9G

2013-12-31 Thread Alex Moonshine
On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 12:43:15 +0100 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > That's very strange. [...] > > No, it's not strange, the issues might be related to some hardware > issue, e.g. a wrong graphics driver. > > The OP can use a search engine and learn how to provide more info, so > that the list is abl

Re: which image shall I use for P4/2.9G

2013-12-31 Thread Alex Moonshine
On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 05:40:19 -0500 Long Wind wrote: > I have run a squeeze i386 CD > After selecting the first menu item "Install" the screen turn blank > > I have run a suse 9.3 installation CD > it says I'm running 32-bit software on 64bit computer > > I have plugged hard disk with i386 whee

Re: Installing Cinnamon 2.0

2013-10-11 Thread Alex Moonshine
> > > On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:50:01 +0200 > > > Ralf Mardorf wrote: > I'm speaking about upstream and here is one conflict: > > [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ sudo pacman -S mate-file-archiver > resolving dependencies... > looking for inter-conflicts... > :: mate-file-archiver and file-roller are in c

Re: Installing Cinnamon 2.0

2013-10-11 Thread Alex Moonshine
Off-topic On 11.10.2013 17:41, Ralf Mardorf wrote: MATE from upstream does conflict with other software. This isn't good, it's the most worse I can imagine and likely the reason that distros aren't interested to add it to official repositories. MATE is the only software I know available for Linu

Re: Installing Cinnamon 2.0

2013-10-11 Thread Alex Moonshine
Still, when I was looking for something that feels like Gnome2, I was dissatisfied with my short Cinnamon experience. Too slow and bloated, doesn't resemble G2 much in fact. I'm using MATE right now and it's good, but from the perspective viewpoint, I'd stick with XFCE. On 11.10.2013 16:36, Joche

Re: Graphic card advice

2013-06-24 Thread Alex Moonshine
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 10:37:38 +0200 a...@alphanet.ch wrote: > I simply wonder if it is better to take a graphic card with an ATI or > a NVIDIA chipset. I've had all kinds of problems with ATI proprietary drivers (fglrx), from missing hardware acceleration to freezing desktop and awful font rende

Re: 32bit apps under amd64 and nvidia

2013-05-25 Thread Alex Moonshine
> On Sun, 26 May 2013 08:01:33 +0200 > "Hans-J. Ullrich" wrote: > > > > This will not work. The problem is missing libxvmc1:ii386, which got > > a dependency problem. There is a bugreport related to it. They say, > > it was fixed by adding a new libnvidiaxvmc1, but it is still not. Got > > the sam

Re: network problems

2013-05-09 Thread Alex Moonshine
On Wed, 08 May 2013 19:57:29 +0200 Sven Joachim wrote: > Yes, unless you use multiarch. There is still the unresolved issue > that binNMUs break co-installability. Packages which have been > binNMU'ed on one architecture but not on another are not > coinstallable at all, and even those where th