Re: lynx and google.com

2004-05-29 Thread Albert Cahalan
Clive Menzies writes: > On (06/05/04 11:14), William Ballard wrote: >> On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 06:57:52PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote: >> >>> On (06/05/04 09:23), William Ballard wrote: >>> Has anybody tried '

Re: [Fwd: ps broken]

2003-11-11 Thread Albert Cahalan
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 21:21, Prasanna Meda wrote: > Albert Cahalan wrote: > > > On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 19:21, Prasanna Meda wrote: > > > > > In reply to > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2002/debian-user-200206/msg01866.html > > > > >

Re: [Fwd: ps broken]

2003-11-10 Thread Albert Cahalan
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 19:21, Prasanna Meda wrote: > In reply to > http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2002/debian-user-200206/msg01866.html > > I also noticed the same problem. It is due to > ps trying to access the past end ofmmaped > System.map file in my case. What does your > trace s

Re: [OT] Process on which processor

2003-03-18 Thread Albert Cahalan
nate writes: > there was a SMP patch for procps a couple years ago, > which also added SMP support to top. That's very buggy and obsolete. Something like it went into Red Hat; better code is in debian-unstable. > I remember the 'ps' from it would show which > processor a process was on. So look