I using the gpg command correctly and should I be pointing to
keyring.debian.org?
If so is anyone else able to download 30B34DD5? Would anyone be so
kind as to try?
Kind regards,
Adam Barton.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adam Barton wrote:
[SNIP]
If I manually verify ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/Release
& Release.gpg I get the following:
blueboy:~# gpg --verify ./Release.gpg ./Release
gpg: Signature made Thu Nov 20 19:57:33 2003 CET using DSA key ID
38C6029A
gpg: Good signature from &qu
Adam Barton wrote:
Adam Barton wrote:
People,
Perhaps you could give me a hand with an issue I am having with the
apt-check-sigs script. Also would you mind CCing me on your responses
as I am off list right now.
I have been updating with 'apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrad
Adam Barton wrote:
People,
Perhaps you could give me a hand with an issue I am having with the
apt-check-sigs script. Also would you mind CCing me on your responses
as I am off list right now.
I have been updating with 'apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade'
which has bee
a release file that
didn't have an associated .gpg file on mirror.ac.uk)
Below is the real info.
Kind regards,
Adam Barton.
I have been carrying out the following as root:
# apt-get update
# ./apt-check-sigs.pl
gpg: error reading key: public key not found
./apt-c
Jan Minar wrote:
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 08:50:23AM +, Adam Barton wrote:
Jan Minar wrote:
Now the wisdom: Some 101% of the bragging about computer security is
just that: bragging.
Including this thread, of course.
Yes. I understood this to be your intended meaning, and I
Jan Minar wrote:
Now the wisdom: Some 101% of the bragging about computer security is
just that: bragging.
Yes indeed. This is very true.
Adam.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg Norris wrote:
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 11:47:36PM +0100, Jan Minar wrote:
At least then a script kiddy won't simply find port 22 open and
start to bruteforce your ssh password. He has to scan higher than
normal to find your SSH which he/she is less likely to do.
This is a ``security
Stephen Touset wrote:
I've recently set up a firewall in our house, running Debian. It's using
iptables to do packet filtering. When I installed it, my mother started
[snip]
If anyone could help me discover what the problem is, or point me in the
direction of someone who could, I would be *extrem
Jan Minar wrote:
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 06:06:34PM -0500, Johann Koenig wrote:
On Thursday January 1 at 11:47pm
Jan Minar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 09:42:09PM +, Adam Barton wrote:
At least then a script kiddy won't simply find port 22 ope
Pigeon wrote:
On the following setup:
Local end Remote end
InternetLAN
Local box:ppp0---ppp0:NAT box:eth0---Other boxes
From the local end, I can ping the remo
nd back to the
list so I may profit from your hard work ;)
Kind regards,
Adam Barton.
stan wrote:
I'm trying to et fwbuilder to work. I've tried on a testing machine that I
just updated today _and_ and unstable machine. In both cases when I try to
run it, it complains about npt find
mirror.ac.uk) then check the
thread above for my sources.list file I included in my original mail.
Once you know it works, though, I suggest you change the sources.list
using apt-setup to use servers more local to yourself.
Let us know how it goes!
Kind regards,
Adam Barton.
Russ Schneide
I got from
google) to ensure updates are are genuine.
Oh and Wynn. I promise to start my posts with 'People' in future.
I assume this is appropriate for yourself? ;)
Ad.
--
Kind regards,
Adam Barton.
wynn wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:19:24PM +0000, Adam Barton wrote:
Guys,
that they are indeed a genuine debian update?
If so, how to I check the current 'version' that I am running and also
that it is the 'current' version.
Kind regards,
Adam Barton.
Output of 'apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade'
blueboy:~# apt-get up
15 matches
Mail list logo
